04-24-2010, 01:20 AM
(04-24-2010, 01:19 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I could say so many things about how much of a waste of time posting that was.
HAHAHA AND THE FUCKING TEXT BOOK YOU ORIGINALLY POSTED WASN'T?
(04-24-2010, 01:19 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I could say so many things about how much of a waste of time posting that was.
(04-24-2010, 01:21 AM)Glukom Wrote: [ -> ]sounds to me like he's legitimately trying to salvage his reputationI'm sorry, but salvaging a reputation after making a first post that angers nearly everyone involved in the project is a hard thing to do.
(04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Alpha Six Wrote: [ -> ]It's not necessarily "non-spriters," but if said user hasn't actually sprited, they're more and more likely to come off as wrong. Especially when they bring up completely invalid arguments as an effort to save face. :l
(04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not saying criticism isn't necessary! Quote me on where I actually said that, for heavens sake!
(04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I said Pointless criticism
You're welcome.
(hint: there is no such thing as pointless criticism unless it's completely wrong-- which none of the criticism in the sprites here ever is. :l
(04-24-2010, 01:24 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ](04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Alpha Six Wrote: [ -> ]It's not necessarily "non-spriters," but if said user hasn't actually sprited, they're more and more likely to come off as wrong. Especially when they bring up completely invalid arguments as an effort to save face. :l
(04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not saying criticism isn't necessary! Quote me on where I actually said that, for heavens sake!
(04-24-2010, 01:14 AM)Tarvonas Wrote: [ -> ]I said Pointless criticism
You're welcome.
(hint: there is no such thing as pointless criticism unless it's completely wrong-- which none of the criticism in the sprites here ever is. :l
What? I said quote me on where I said criticism wasn't necessary. Not where I said "pointless criticism". I never said criticism in general is not necessary. Criticism is great! I'm all for it! It's just when people point out insignificant little things that inevitably delay working progress... that's just what I think needs to be avoided here.
Also... as an effort to save face? Or maybe I'm posting these things as an effort to further help my suggestion, and possibly benefit the forums here in terms of working speed.
Alright, Pointless isn't the word. Unnecessary is more like it.
(04-24-2010, 01:24 AM)Alpha Six Wrote: [ -> ]You're completely missing the point.
You're saying that criticism isn't useful if the sprite looks passable. And that's fine and dandy, but have you considered that some people are getting involved in this not only to sprite their favorite characters, but to improve their current skill?
It doesn't matter if it looks passable to you or anybody else if the spriter is actually looking to improve in their work in every way possible.
Whether or not a sprite is good is not dependent on just the shading and the usability. It's dependent on structure, color palettes, emotion, and depth. If something looks off, we're going to crit it, because that's what we're supposed to do.
Whereas you keep making the "pointless crit" argument, ignoring when people are saying that there is no such thing as pointless crit. And then when people try to further their points, you just shoot it down and act like you magically don't care anymore. You're not actually seeing our angle for it-- you're just dismissing what we're saying in the hopes that this will just blow over magically.
And that's why people are still angry about it. :/
(04-24-2010, 01:24 AM)Alpha Six Wrote: [ -> ]You're completely missing the point.
You're saying that criticism isn't useful if the sprite looks passable. And that's fine and dandy, but have you considered that some people are getting involved in this not only to sprite their favorite characters, but to improve their current skill?
It doesn't matter if it looks passable to you or anybody else if the spriter is actually looking to improve in their work in every way possible.
Whether or not a sprite is good is not dependent on just the shading and the usability. It's dependent on structure, color palettes, emotion, and depth. If something looks off, we're going to crit it, because that's what we're supposed to do.
Whereas you keep making the "pointless crit" argument, ignoring when people are saying that there is no such thing as pointless crit. And then when people try to further their points, you just shoot it down and act like you magically don't care anymore. You're not actually seeing our angle for it-- you're just dismissing what we're saying in the hopes that this will just blow over magically.
And that's why people are still angry about it. :/
(04-24-2010, 01:32 AM)Alpha Six Wrote: [ -> ]Let me close by saying that Runouw's engine popped up AFTER the project started. When this project began, its original intention was just to sprite all of the characters of Brawl in a universal style. It eventually evolved into a game idea, and then Runouw appeared to code for the idea to turn it into a game.
That doesn't stop it from being purely a spriting project though. The game is just a bonus as far as most of us are considered.