(06-25-2010, 06:39 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2010, 10:39 AM)GaryCXJk Wrote: [ -> ]Actually, the game doesn't encourage you to outright kill these bears. To get the most points, you'd have to drive them to suicide. At least that's what an early interview stated.
So it's Mad World... but in Reverse?
That actually sounds like considerably less fun. If I wanted an emotional torture simulator I'd play The Sims. Or Rollercoaster Tycoon.
Or Zoo Tycoon.
Or any video game based on life and business
:|
(06-25-2010, 06:39 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote: [ -> ] (06-25-2010, 10:39 AM)GaryCXJk Wrote: [ -> ]Actually, the game doesn't encourage you to outright kill these bears. To get the most points, you'd have to drive them to suicide. At least that's what an early interview stated.
So it's Mad World... but in Reverse?
That actually sounds like considerably less fun. If I wanted an emotional torture simulator I'd play The Sims. Or Rollercoaster Tycoon.
That and in Mad World you played as a fucking awesome guy with an arm that turned into a chainsaw, this your a lame stuffed animal.
Okay now I am having second thoughts on this game...
Really, just driving them to suicide? Doing that alone is pretty lame.
I feel bad now for knowing about this game.
Don't get me wrong, you still can get mad points for outright killing them, preferably in the most horrible ways, but suicide gives you madder points.
well with the economy and the state the world is in, the bears will eventually kill themselves anyway.
(06-26-2010, 02:08 AM)GaryCXJk Wrote: [ -> ]Don't get me wrong, you still can get mad points for outright killing them, preferably in the most horrible ways, but suicide gives you madder points.
you could have said that earlier given the fact you made it sound like you pretty much only force them to commit suicide.
but still, why bother doing that just to get a high score, screw that.
killing stuff for "points" is so 80's anyway 9_9
(06-24-2010, 12:10 PM)Diogalesu Wrote: [ -> ]This is from the same guys who made WET by the way.
doesnt make the game good
at all
bethesda has a great habit of overproducing games and making them into total shit. i have wet. liked it, but after the mandatory "rubi's house" missions it quickly turned into a game i'd never play again >:
oh wait is this
happy tree friends the interactive psychological thriller film?
(06-27-2010, 09:54 PM)kosheh Wrote: [ -> ]oh wait is this
happy tree friends the interactive psychological thriller film?
I almost thought this, but I don't think it will be
this bad.
(06-27-2010, 10:51 PM)JarJar Wrote: [ -> ]I almost thought this, but I don't think it will be this bad.
is basically the exact same concept.
xept for the explicit gore.
Sadly not all that fun. The entire concept is worn off after the first 5 minutes...
The actual gameplay is pretty much the same thing repeated but with different scenarios, and most just involve racking up as many points as you can to leave the area you're in...
There's also a very tiny number of levels, with lots of different ways to do them (Time attack, etc.)
In terms of controls, it's all very sensitive. You can't help but accidentally run every so often while hiding in the bushes, and you can't even sneak while out of bushes, only walk, which again, is hard because you will start to run.
The introductions to all the levels are pretty funny, but that's about it. The gameplay and goals are so repeatative that I just don't see this being worth the money it's being sold at. I'd go for a £5.99 PSN download any day, since the multiplayer is alright, but besides that, you're not looking at any ground breaking gaming here.
basically, a game by people who probably went "XDDD animal violence i love happy tree friends" is extremely shallow and doesn't provide lasting entertainment for those of us over 13?? well im shocked
Yeah, after hearing about that whole suicide thing I completely changed my mind on this for the same reasons.
It'll be a flop too considering the concept itself is ripped.
This game does not look like a good game.