The VG Resource

Who said? Also, just because it wasn't announced at E3 doesn't mean they can't announce it later when they have, you know, an actual game or plan. Plus is E3 even technically over? (I don't actually know, I haven't been keeping track)

(06-06-2012, 09:46 PM)TomGuycott Wrote: [ -> ]Who said? Also, just because it wasn't announced at E3 doesn't mean they can't announce it later when they have, you know, an actual game or plan. Plus is E3 even technically over? (I don't actually know, I haven't been keeping track)

It can't be over. We need a fourth meeting! If you want a 4th meeting, all in favor say aye!

Sure, because a pre-planned event between corporate gaming companies can be entirely redefined by a bunch of randoms on an internet forum that they are definitely NOT keeping track of.

Animal Crossing was expected. But Smash Brothers probably didn't even start development at this point. If they didn't show Animal Crossing, which had a pretty solid video last year, there must be a good reason.

Also:

Honestly, I felt that it wasn't even that bad. The issue is that they simply didn't leave anything to get us hyped. It was simply "This is what we are making, it'll be out later this year, k bye. No surprise titles at the last second or anything. Either way, I still found their shows to be the most entertaining, especially when they acknowledged Non-Specific Action Figure's popularity.

Welp this is why we make fan games right Chaoxys?

(06-06-2012, 10:30 PM)Chaoxys Wrote: [ -> ]Honestly, I felt that it wasn't even that bad. The issue is that they simply didn't leave anything to get us hyped. It was simply "This is what we are making, it'll be out later this year, k bye. No surprise titles at the last second or anything. Either way, I still found their shows to be the most entertaining, especially when they acknowledged Non-Specific Action Figure's popularity.

But everything on this conference has had a trailer and an explanation BEFORE today, so it was really pointless

(06-06-2012, 11:47 PM)Maidsukki Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-06-2012, 10:30 PM)Chaoxys Wrote: [ -> ]Honestly, I felt that it wasn't even that bad. The issue is that they simply didn't leave anything to get us hyped. It was simply "This is what we are making, it'll be out later this year, k bye. No surprise titles at the last second or anything. Either way, I still found their shows to be the most entertaining, especially when they acknowledged Non-Specific Action Figure's popularity.

But everything on this conference has had a trailer and an explanation BEFORE today, so it was really pointless

I know. Hence why I said "The issue is that they simply didn't leave anything to get us hyped. It was simply "This is what we are making, it'll be out later this year, k bye. No surprise titles at the last second or anything."

(06-06-2012, 11:33 PM)Koopaul Wrote: [ -> ]Welp this is why we make fan games right Chaoxys?

define the word make

and then define the sentence "make fangame" in a way that has "finish" in it

Well I'd have been happy if they had just put the Animal Crossing logo somehwere on their stupid lovo compilation pictures just to show that it is there somewhere. I don't want to get it next year. Thanks.

(06-07-2012, 01:21 AM)MRSKELETON Wrote: [ -> ]define the word make

and then define the sentence "make fangame" in a way that has "finish" in it

I don't know what I did but you seem fond of picking apart on everything I post. I know you hate me for whatever reason, but it gets old.

yo you know what else gets old? nostalgia
yo dude i dont hate you, i just really dislike you;
I'm also still really upset that you thought that watch dogs being a good game (it had a Good Trailer) makes it ineligible for discussion. there's all kinds of stuff that can be brought up about watch dogs, like whether or not the game is a new direction for open world stuff (or sci-fi games moving away from pulpy battles of good and evil into the realm of real actual speculative fiction) or if its even running on current gen hardware


^^^__ thats to you, dazz

(06-07-2012, 07:10 AM)Koopaul Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2012, 01:21 AM)MRSKELETON Wrote: [ -> ]define the word make

and then define the sentence "make fangame" in a way that has "finish" in it

I don't know what I did but you seem fond of picking apart on everything I post. I know you hate me for whatever reason, but it gets old.

i could be wrong but I think his point is that you bitch about how Nintendo didn't reveal a game, or didn't make a game you wanted for "nostalgias sake" and then commenting on how you make fan games because Nintendo didn't deliver (despite the fact you haven't finished any) has gotten old. that just constantly bitching about what you DIDN'T get instead of what you DID get (Watch Dogs looks good but let's not have a discussion about that!!!) isn't a productive conversation and it's old.

he doesn't hate you it's just annoying.

woah what the fuck am I doing I haven't posted in like two years

(06-08-2012, 03:43 AM)MRSKELETON Wrote: [ -> ]I'm also still really upset that you thought that watch dogs being a good game (it had a Good Trailer) makes it ineligible for discussion. there's all kinds of stuff that can be brought up about watch dogs, like whether or not the game is a new direction for open world stuff (or sci-fi games moving away from pulpy battles of good and evil into the realm of real actual speculative fiction) or if its even running on current gen hardware


^^^__ thats to you, dazz

I'm not saying that, what I'm saying is we all know it looks amazing and kicks ass - that's why nobody has discussed it. There's not much to discuss when something blows you away.

It looks sweet as fuck - if you want to make a discussion out of it, make one.

hey, you´re ok criticizing koopaul about him being annoying (because he is, in that respect-i agree) but i don´t think that leaving passive agressive snippets is good either, sam.



Just to make sure, I have already sent a PM to koopaul explaining everything. I apologize if this post offended anyone. Please don't derail this topic anymore, thanks.