Who gives a flying fuck if Metroid Prime "accurately recreated the experience in 3D"? The point is it's 3D, it's missing the part that makes it classic metroid, which is being in two dimensions. It's not like "OMFGGGG METROID IS RUINED BECAUSE IT'S IN 3D" Because Prime games are just dandy, but I would prefer my metroid in 2D thx
(05-23-2009, 12:29 AM)Level 48 Kabuto (Sonikku) Wrote: [ -> ]despite me having metroid 2 for gb and super metroid for snes i never got around to playing them for more than 5 minutes
I have the roms for both of these on my DS and have played neither for more than 10 minutes
personally I think super metroid is one of the worst in the series, not the best
Metroid zero mission is great though and I beat it
fusion was eh
prime sucks
(05-24-2009, 12:02 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ]personally I think super metroid is one of the worst in the series, not the best
fusion rules it's like the majora's mask of metroid
which means that it's worse than zero mission which is the oot of metroid
seriously zero mission was great
it had great graphics and music and was HUGE and had lots of exploring
fusion was linear as hell and samus looks stupid in it
it's a good game, but nowhere near zero mission's league
(05-24-2009, 01:07 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ]which means that it's worse than zero mission which is the oot of metroid
seriously zero mission was great
it had great graphics and music and was HUGE and had lots of exploring
fusion was linear as hell and samus looks stupid in it
it's a good game, but nowhere near zero mission's league
Well, I liked ZM a little more than Fusion, but only because Fusion was linear and didn't give you much freedom. Before i played the game, I thought you could encounter SA-X randomly, instead of just seeing her 10 or so times through the game, which was dissapointing. But, I really was scared shitless when i found out my weapons did nothing to her.
(05-24-2009, 12:27 PM)fabulous dude Joe Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 12:02 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ]personally I think super metroid is one of the worst in the series, not the best
there is no emoticon to describe what this post makes me think.
(05-23-2009, 02:26 AM)Gizmonicgamer Wrote: [ -> ]cool. popular opinion is now proof of subjective quality and dictator of both truth and opinion
99% of people who go against the mainstream are either doing it to appear different, or are mislead by a previous personal bias.
So pretty much, yea.
(05-23-2009, 10:16 AM)DigiTamer Metaru Wrote: [ -> ]the same metascore that places twilight over windwaker- oops!
Um... they both got the same score.
(05-24-2009, 06:56 PM)DigiTamer Metaru Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 12:27 PM)Fabulous Dude Joe Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 12:02 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ]personally I think super metroid is one of the worst in the series, not the best
there is no emoticon to describe what this post makes me think.
it's BORING
(05-24-2009, 08:58 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 06:56 PM)DigiTamer Metaru Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 12:27 PM)Fabulous Dude Joe Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2009, 12:02 PM)Vipershark Wrote: [ -> ]personally I think super metroid is one of the worst in the series, not the best
there is no emoticon to describe what this post makes me think.
it's BORING
How so?
I couldn't stay interested for more than 5 minutes
I got out of the blue place at the beginning and then just stopped
no matter how many times I played I never got past samus's ship at the beginning
it just never held my interest, unlike fusion and zero mission which kept me hooked all the way through
Hm? People who dislike great games never have a good explanation why.
"oh god, i don't read books because i have to read so many pages..."
(guess who i am)
no that's only if it's a boring book
also koopaul how is that not a good explanation
the game is boring