We're getting into the same grounds here as with Fire Emblem. Most of us only have a vague idea of what the series is about, so we can't really think up anything. Does someone want to volunteer to do a little research and see what Sukapon is capable of?
I think he threw his body parts in different ways, really.
I'll see about looking deeper into it.
Also, what the hells guys.
What the hells.
(11-09-2009, 11:19 PM)Tonberry2k Wrote: [ -> ]We're getting into the same grounds here as with Fire Emblem.
God damn it.
Ton...just....god damn it!
(11-09-2009, 10:24 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: [ -> ]Lolo would be a terrible choice
he's now only a boss in the Kirby series
Pit appeared in TWO games
His argument for Lolo was dumb, but Lolo DID have two games of his own more if you consider the Eggerland series. I think Pit and Lolo are about equal in the grand scale of things. Not that I care about having that character.
(11-09-2009, 10:24 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: [ -> ]Only YOU want the Oracles in. if another zelda chacter get in, it would be Skull Kid or Vaati not some goddesses that nobody know
The Goddesses are prominent characters in the Zelda series more prominent than the overhyped Vaati or the one time Skull Kid. But Honestly I think that Tingle would be the next best choice, but that's just me.
(11-09-2009, 10:24 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: [ -> ]Oh god people stop talking about DLC
Why? If it is going to be considered it IS going to be a major part of this game considering what it does.
Sukapon throws his head and can stretch out his body parts mainly. He also rolls and does some odd punches and kicks.
I'm sure his moves could be tweaked to fit smash since he's really just floating parts.
Yeah, I'm not really feeling Sukapon. It's not off the table, but he's nobody I'd rush to play as.
I don't know why you consider such characters Ton.
You hate the idea of having certain characters because they're not popular enough or don't have a good story and yet you actually consider Sukapon? Isn't Sukapon the very definition of what you don't want?
I think you're kinda misunderstanding his reasoning, bro.
Yes maybe I am. But his arguments leave me confused. Its almost contradicting.
He says one thing to leave out a character then considers a character that has the same faults perhaps worse!
