The VG Resource

Didn't you say that already...?

Nope, that one referred to Bomberman not being called a Konami character.

(11-27-2009, 06:53 PM)Rags Wrote: [ -> ]Y'know


Solink had an awesome idea in the thread for the third party characters. It had a lot of thanks.


So let's just say everyone agrees with it.

or something.

But really going back to the old "Two from one company" is dumb seeing as we had a goddamn poll.

(11-28-2009, 05:07 PM)GaryCXJk Wrote: [ -> ]Saying Geno isn't a Square-Enix / third party character is as much as a Travisty as wanting Travis over Samurai Goroh.

So, subsequently, we already filled Square-Enix' spot.

Okay, you're using the travisty thing way too much, it's lame now.

But yeah, I don't really think it's right to go "oh well Geno was in a Mario game so he's first party" That's like saying that retarded king character from the Zelda CD-i games is a first party character (stupid example but it's valid and the only one I could think of) because he was in a Zelda game. Whether or not Geno starred in a Mario game, he's Square-Enix's character, making him third party.

That being said, I don't think it's fair to have Geno take up Square-Enix's character spot. Personally, I'm not really sure why he's in the roster to begin with. Is he really such a big star, in relation to Nintendo, or video games in general?

(11-28-2009, 06:55 PM)Sol Wrote: [ -> ]That being said, I don't think it's fair to have Geno take up Square-Enix's character spot. Personally, I'm not really sure why he's in the roster to begin with. Is he really such a big star, in relation to Nintendo, or video games in general?

Geno and King Dedede were both first place in the Brawl poll.
He beat Megaman and Sonic. I think he should be an exception.

Geno can't be an exception. If you intend to have a FF rep you'd have two Square characters which wouldn't be fair.

Maybe six is good enough? SEGA, Konami, Capcom, Square, Namco and Treasure?

(11-28-2009, 10:53 PM)koopaul Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe six is good enough? SEGA, Konami, Capcom, Square, Namco and Treasure?

This. Why struggle to pick eight when five or six do just fine?

We were actually fine until people stated bitching about Travis.

OMG! This whole conversation is getting so bothersome! It should be six/seven third parties AT THE MOST. All this is accomplishing is bull sh*t. These conversations are the ones that cause other fangames to end. I'm sorry for sounding like a moron, but this is ridiculous. When we can get past the flipping roster, we can actually start working on the damn game.

Geno for Square, Vivian to represent the Mario RPG series.

Ton did Villager (Animal Crosser) make it? What about Ray? Not that I care but I almost got the first-party roster made and organized.

I grew kinda tired waiting so I'm kinda doing it myself.

An AC character is definitely a great idea. It just needs a better name than "Animal Crosser" or "Villager." I've been tossing around a "final" roster for the last day or so (but we all know how that can change) so hopefully I'll be able to show you all my ideas tomorrow.

Well I didn't know that... I made this thinking that you weren't gonna put him in.

(11-29-2009, 01:10 AM)koopaul Wrote: [ -> ]Well I didn't know that... I made this thinking that you weren't gonna put him in.

I thought the Dixie idea was ditched. Also when did we decided that Issac and the guy below him were gonna be playable?

(11-29-2009, 10:30 AM)HyperSonic92 Wrote: [ -> ]I thought the Dixie idea was ditched. Also when did we decided that Issac and the guy below him were gonna be playable?

I don't know about Dixie or Ray, but Issac was decided a few weeks ago.

http://www.spriters-resource.com/communi...p?tid=9776
(check the date of the first post)

Pretty much everybody, including Ton, agrees that he should be in.