03-01-2010, 05:21 PM
Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)
Pokemon, what happened to you?
|
03-01-2010, 05:24 PM
03-01-2010, 05:32 PM
(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries. I severely doubt this. All Legendary pokémon have much higher BSTs than the majority (if not all) fully evolved non-legends. Lati@s may be an exception, but Soul Orb pushes them up into the range of the others again. The Trios of each gen also have lower BSTs, but they're still well in the range of the highest.
03-01-2010, 05:33 PM
what the fuck is a bst?
03-01-2010, 05:37 PM
Ah sorry. Base Stat Total. In some cases it doesn't matter; but in most it's the main reason why (for example) you'd find Venusaur stronger than Victreebel; even though they're the same typing and learn similar moves.
03-01-2010, 05:43 PM
(03-01-2010, 05:32 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote:Even this little shit?(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries. And this one? Or are these just not legendaries and their placing in the Pokedex is totally random?
theyre the mew of the 4th gen
both of them. mew-celebi-jirachi-manaphy/shaymin all have the same total base stats. Thanked by: GrooveMan.exe, Cshad, Maxpphire
03-01-2010, 06:18 PM
(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries. I literally do have a box just for legendaries and I don't even have remotely close to all of them. Thanked by: Sengir, Ton,
03-01-2010, 06:23 PM
http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/stat/all.shtml top 100 pokemon with highest total base stats
just to show who's a legendary and who isnt, and those who arent are psuedo-legendary(dragonite, garchomp, metagross, etc.) 580 and up is the limit, anything below that is nonlegendary (lucario is all the way at the bottom for retards who still think he's anything close to a legendary) MY BEEF IS WITH PIKACHU. He used to be cute now he's just creepy and anorexic... but that is a bad pic of old pikachu
03-01-2010, 10:15 PM
Sugimori has the best Pokemon art style, prove me wrong.
Pikachu was fat.
Thanked by: Maxpphire
03-02-2010, 06:54 PM
and funny
man...pokemon season 1 2 and 3 was funny to watch
03-02-2010, 07:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2010, 07:15 PM by TomGuycott.)
There's a lot of Pokemon that shouldn't be called "Legendaries", just "super retarded rare" pokemon, even though in the game programing there's only one unique way to get them ONLY once. However, you can't blame them for having new legendaries every generation, that's essentially reducing the number of Pokemon. What you CAN blame them for is exponentially increasing the number of Legendaries per generation.
Gen 1: 5 Gen 2: 6 Gen 3: 10 (One of which had 3 forms) Gen 4: 13 (Two of which had 2 forms) So yeah, the AMOUNT of Legendaries per game is constantly increasing. They should cool off on that a tad. What would be kind of cool is more UNIQUE Pokemon, kinda like the Red Gyrados. Basically, Pokemon you only meet once in the game, maybe a variation of an existing one, maybe a cool one you can only get once or in one way, but not necessarily a Legendary. One thing Pokemon lacks is good boss fight Pokemon. That's kind of due to the nature of the game, though, I suppose. OH, and in comment to the song, it's a fun and funny song. But if he's really serious, then just play the classics and stop crying tears of nostalgia.
03-02-2010, 07:17 PM
gen 5: 28 legendaries
50 hour story no online Thanked by: TomGuycott, Vipershark, Maxpphire
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|