what? no, i just find chess very feminine

Quote:Other M

Oh god, that fucking game.

That fucking game.

Quote:And it really ticks me off when characters I like are ruined by sexualization!

Uh huh. I found some parts of Other M to be totally inane. Apart from Samus being more sexualized than ever before, the personality they fabricated for her struck me as equally offensive. Part of me is dreading the next Metroid game.

Also, Grooveman

(07-17-2011, 04:06 PM)Sengir Wrote: what? no, i just find chess very feminine

That's fascinating.
But where are your high heels?

---

While you're at it, make me a sandwich.

nobody has any idea what anyone else is saying in this topic lmao

(07-17-2011, 04:17 PM)Glukom Wrote: nobody has any idea what anyone else is saying in this topic lmao

No, that's just you. Or do you have something valid to contribute?

(07-17-2011, 04:21 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote:

(07-17-2011, 04:17 PM)Glukom Wrote: nobody has any idea what anyone else is saying in this topic lmao

No, that's just you. Or do you have something valid to contribute?

No like really, people are misinterpreting Caruso as being a sexist, when he's not really advocating anything like that at all. And this challenge doesn't really apply to what he's been saying, either.

this whole topic is one giant overreaction (on both sides)

(07-17-2011, 04:23 PM)Glukom Wrote:

(07-17-2011, 04:21 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote:

(07-17-2011, 04:17 PM)Glukom Wrote: nobody has any idea what anyone else is saying in this topic lmao

No, that's just you. Or do you have something valid to contribute?

No like really, people are misinterpreting Caruso as being a sexist, when he's not really advocating anything like that at all. And this challenge doesn't really apply to what he's been saying, either.

this whole topic is one giant overreaction (on both sides)

Watch out! they might shove you in too!

(07-17-2011, 04:23 PM)Glukom Wrote: this whole topic is one giant overreaction (on both sides)

No it isn't.

Your side is saying stuff, and so is ours in response. When something that you are saying is wrong, we say something about it.

This is a debate.

I dunno why they would, it's not like I'm being sexist either. I just want to clarify things

>Implying people get to personally decide whether or not they're being sexist.

(07-17-2011, 04:26 PM)Alpha Six Wrote:

(07-17-2011, 04:23 PM)Glukom Wrote: this whole topic is one giant overreaction (on both sides)

No it isn't.

Your side is saying stuff, and so is ours in response. When something that you are saying is wrong, we say something about it.

This is a debate.

I don't have a side really, I did when me and you were debating (which was fine) but now it's kind of escalated to the point where people don't understand each other (and as such, people on caruso's side are being seen as sexists when they aren't)

Listen I might have said it's totally okay for women to be stereotyped as masturbation aids but let me tell you, I'm not sexist.

> "people are misinterpreting Caruso as being a sexist"
> "it's not like I'm being sexist either"

which is it pal
(surprise surprise if you hold sexist views you are being sexist)

(07-17-2011, 04:26 PM)Glukom Wrote: I dunno why they would, it's not like I'm being sexist either. I just want to clarify things

And I just pointed out that the queen is the best piece in chess in a more humorous tone. It's not about being sexist anymore!

(07-17-2011, 04:28 PM)lord bestfriendgeny Wrote: > "people are misinterpreting Caruso as being a sexist"
> "it's not like I'm being sexist either"

which is it pal
(surprise surprise if you hold sexist views you are being sexist)

I meant all of us aren't


Also I wouldn't be looking at this in terms of 'sides,' really. Grouping Caruso, Koopaul, and Sengir all together as if they're saying the same things is a little nonsensical.