I don't know if anyone is reading my posts because I haven't seen any response, but I will reiterate my observation that after the events of Night 1, the circumstances we were left in put us in position to NOT vote anyone off, preventing a possible 3 murders. This means that anyone on the evil team would have wanted to reach an execution.

(08-20-2012, 03:51 AM)Kat Wrote: I did think Keiang was innocent, there was no reason to vote for him, except the fact that he doesn't think things through, which makes him an easy target to take down. It wouldn't be hard for baddies to convince you guys to vote for him or Sir Zabandanan. Mainly just because they don't think things through. Sir Zabanandanana's vote for me is kinda proof in this because I really don't see the logic.

Right after I mention this, robo9 tries to convince you guys to vote Keiang off. I don't think thats trustworthy.

The fact that Shadow Kami kept the vote is even more untrustworthy, and I didn't notice this before, so!!!!!!

I think Kat has the strategy for the evil teams thought-out pretty well. I think I read that this is Sir Zabadaban's first time playing? so, his suspicious behavior might just be inexperience but his constant accusations have pretty consistently lacked sound logic. I think he is innocent, for much the same reason I thought Keiang was innocent.

We had a couple votes that started a bandwagon from players that have been active, but also fairly reserved in their posting: I think robo9 and ShadowKami are both suspect at this point, though I won't vote until later.

Hey guys, for future reference, please don't edit your posts to change votes, make a new post with your new vote. It makes it kind of hard to keep track of votes, for me and other players. The idea is that people are trying to analyze and make conclusions based on your votes, and to a point, posts, and it's difficult (more so than desired from a balance standpoint) to do that when they get edited. So just keep that in mind. Thanks!

oh, whoops
Unvote: Kat
Vote: Shadow Kami

Vote: Robo9

Will explain reasoning in a later post, I dont have much time to type right now.

(08-20-2012, 11:53 AM)Chameleon Wrote:

(08-20-2012, 03:51 AM)Kat Wrote: I really don't see the logic.

I think I read that this is Sir Zabadaban's first time playing? so, his suspicious behavior might just be inexperience but his constant accusations have pretty consistently lacked sound logic.

Leaving the quote-in-quote because it is the same point.
Yes this is my first time playing, and my reasoning being that I know Robo9 did not do anything last night, so therefore he is either innocent or neutral.
Kat tried to get him killed, meaning that she is probably not on the Side of Good.
I should mention that Shadow Kami did not target anyone last night either, and likely has no powers.

I don't have time to think this through because I've got to go to work in a minute, but we need to execute someone so

Vote: robo9

I'm way overdue with bedtime thanks to my rips. So let me just get this done quickly and get to sleep.

Vote: [robo9]

He's #9 on the participants list and has a 9 in his username.

Seriously though, there's not much that'd give me any reason to assume anyone to be a bad guy so it's more of a wild guess based on the anti-Keiang interaction plus everyone seems to vote robo9 this round.

(08-20-2012, 03:00 PM)Britt Wrote: Vote: Robo9

Will explain reasoning in a later post, I dont have much time to type right now.

Hrm

See, I almost jumped this bandwagon since
a) we haven't been capable of executing any baddies yet, and they're quickly slaughtering us, and
b) Robo was the initiator of a prior bandwagon.

but, I don't want to blindly do this. I don't want to execute him and then have two more guys picked off from the baddies because we messed up a vote : (

Vote: Rosencrantz

you seem pretty good at this game, rosencrantz. maybe... too good. you've played mafia/werewolf before, haven't you? it's starting to seem like you could be a recolorer who's doing a really good job of leading us astray.

or i could just be super fucking paranoid.

Vote: Shadow Kami

I really don't think the bandwagon railing against robo9 makes much sense, while SK's actions do seem rather... out of place. In any case, at least a chance of a death of the evil factions is better than just letting them pick and choose.

Vote: Shadow Kami

Not much reason other than an attempt to save my ass. Although if it turns out Kami is innocent, we'd be down the same amount of innocents. If not, well fuck there's a lucky shot.

Vote: Nobody
I really don't have a lead ATM(That I can see any in the topic), so that's my vote.

Shadow Kami is a really chancy shot, I would say 30-35% chance he is anything other than innocent.
Well it looks like Kat won't be dying this round so
Vote: Shadow Kami
Just because it is possible that robo9 has a power, so we lose more by killing him.

(08-20-2012, 07:54 PM)Crappy Blue Luigi Wrote: Vote: Rosencrantz

you seem pretty good at this game, rosencrantz. maybe... too good. you've played mafia/werewolf before, haven't you? it's starting to seem like you could be a recolorer who's doing a really good job of leading us astray.

or i could just be super fucking paranoid.

>: O

I am really hurt that you would suggest something like that ;,(

I'm sorry if my posts seem like me trying to lead other posters astray, but I'm just laying out facts and hoping that we all reach logical conclusions based on that.

Really, I'm afraid to really delve into analysis since Keiang was murdered and he was really shaping up as a good detective.



Though it kind of weirds me out why you're pinning me specifically as a recolorer and not just a baddy in general. Is it because you know I'm not a sprite thief for sure, since you, as a thief, know the entire thief team????




God dammit now you got me paranoid

---

Also considering that there's still 16 players, we need at least 8 votes to get a majority. We're split 3 Robo, 5 Kami, and 1 me (why crappy why I wanted a no-vote record ). There is a chance we will not come close to a majority tonight anyway :C

Well I have to say, Rosencrantz, that you make yourself seem kind of suspicious by never ever voting, which implies that you do not need to vote to get things done.