(08-20-2014, 01:20 AM)Drshnaps Wrote: Every enemy we've seen for Smash Run so far is from a franchise with a confirmed fighter attributed to it; the only exception is the Polar Bear from Ice Climbers, which was one of the earliest enemies we've seen.

Not true.



We don't have anyone for the White Ghost/Sneaky Spirits from the GBA Rhythm Heaven/Tengoku.

Should someone call a plumber? I think the pipes are leaking again

Even if the roster is leaked, I have yet to see all costumes.

Something worth noting: The apparent DLC post on the image I posted is apparently confirmed NOT to be the same guy that posted the images in the first place, so that is probably not associated. Also I've heard the person said he had yet to unlock everything, but again, grain of salt.

Personally, I see this coinciding with Gematsu and the leak that had the character palettes before they were actually revealed.

I will only be somewhat convinced of this once I see...

I'm 90% sure the leak is true. Those last two "leaked" screenshots were not by the same guy though. But please, there are WAY more arguments in FAVOR of it than AGAINST it.

- Completely new models that nobody has seen yet
- Kirby has a thick line on top of his character portait in the bottom screen that's kind of a "bug" that happens when you're choosing characters
- No names because they wouldn't fit with all the characters
- Today's Famitsu scan showed a part of the Tomodachi Life stage that is in the leak and hasn't been shown before till now
- Bottom row has a "clone" corner. What leaker would ever do this?

Most arguments against it are really shallow and seem more like people not wanting to believe than anything else

Oh and DLC claims are mostly confirmed to not be the same guy at all

(08-20-2014, 08:32 AM)Sportoise Wrote: Should someone call a plumber? I think the pipes are leaking again

Spoiler

That's amazing how they're able to take a picture of only the top screen when the bottom screen should still be visible

And then take a picture where the top screen and bottom screen are right next to each other without a divide in-between

(08-20-2014, 03:17 PM)Zero Kirby Wrote:

(08-20-2014, 08:32 AM)Sportoise Wrote: Should someone call a plumber? I think the pipes are leaking again

Spoiler

That's amazing how they're able to take a picture of only the top screen when the bottom screen should still be visible

And then take a picture where the top screen and bottom screen are right next to each other without a divide in-between

3DS capture cards aren't that amazing. It's been estabilished that this is a video sent to ESRB for rating purposes, not taken from an actual 3DS.

(08-20-2014, 03:19 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: 3DS capture cards aren't that amazing. It's been estabilished that this is a video sent to ESRB for rating purposes, not taken from an actual 3DS.

I'm still not convinced this is real. If it is a video from a capture card, how come the bottom screen still isn't visible in those top two screen shots?

Considering it looks like this, that's just really bizarre.

(08-20-2014, 03:30 PM)Zero Kirby Wrote:

(08-20-2014, 03:19 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: 3DS capture cards aren't that amazing. It's been estabilished that this is a video sent to ESRB for rating purposes, not taken from an actual 3DS.

I'm still not convinced this is real. If it is a video from a capture card, how come the bottom screen still isn't visible in those top two screen shots?

Considering it looks like this, that's just really bizarre.

Is zooming in or approaching the screen really that far fetched...?

(08-20-2014, 03:38 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: Is zooming in or approaching the screen really that far fetched...?

It's not normally

But considering the third screenshot has the screens literally right next to each other

Why would that be different for the first two

(08-20-2014, 04:03 PM)Zero Kirby Wrote:

(08-20-2014, 03:38 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: Is zooming in or approaching the screen really that far fetched...?

It's not normally

But considering the third screenshot has the screens literally right next to each other

Why would that be different for the first two

what is hard to grasp? he took the first of only the top screen so they would be closer and bigger and took the next one so you could see the bottom screen.

This is the least thing anybody is even pointing about this being fake, it's pretty logical

Welp, I see it's time for me to abandon this thread. Later peeps.

(08-20-2014, 04:30 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: what is hard to grasp? he took the first of only the top screen so they would be closer and bigger and took the next one so you could see the bottom screen.

This is the least thing anybody is even pointing about this being fake, it's pretty logical

Okay so

The third screenshot



Both screens. Right next to each other. There is literally no space between them. So it's not from a real 3DS hence it's a video sent to the ESRB blah blah blah okay. That makes sense. I'm okay with that.



Where did the second screen go. What is with all the black space underneath? Why would a video sent to the ESRB neglect to have it there? Especially since it miraculously shows up later at the end of the match? And wouldn't leaving it there enhance the authenticity of the leak? Why remove that second screen at all? It makes no sense.

That's what I'm seeing here.

Ah, I see what you mean. Ok I should have mentioned earlier that that 3rd screen is really sketchy. Those last 3 where posted much later than the first batch. While the first and the second can be zoomed in and zoomed out versions (The lack of any sign of bottom screen in the one that the Shulk model appears is because it probably stays black and pops-up the results later like you can see in here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAwX2adg2kI#t=248 ). That gameplay screen is really weird though, it also has "Smash" written on top of it which I found pretty weird. But seeing there's an arrow on the side of it, maybe this one is a photo, it seems plausible that ESRB would receive both photos and videos.

But aside from these last 3 that were posted on GameFAQS and are completely unrelated to the first poster, I don't see many arguments disproving any of it. In fact, more and more in favor keep piling up