(05-28-2010, 02:59 AM)Ultimecia Wrote:
Please zip this and upload to some server like www.ziddu.com or www.mediafire.com (I recommend Mediafire)


Might have been resized


Resized. Change your photobucket resizing configuration


So much useless space!


Why such a HUGE signature for such small sheet?

Would you try to keep most of your sheets at 600/800 width (LARGURA), because they really mess up ANY sort of screen.

(05-28-2010, 01:16 PM)Ultimecia Wrote:
Somehow I doubt it's the original canvas size. Just look how much unused space. Put your signature closer (if possible smaller too) and crop it

(05-28-2010, 01:45 PM)Ultimecia Wrote: Oh, I see.

You can't edit my post, you're not a mod

And you STILL didn't limited your sheets to 600-800 width! You got images with 6500 for NO real reason. Please resize the following sheets:
CubeMaps ( 1244x1599 )
Factions ( 1500x349 )
CubeMaps Diffuse ( 1595x290) ( why in the heck this image width is 1595? It makes no sense!)
Corporation ( 1598x447 )
Avatars ( 1599x532 )
Icons ( 1599x1256 )
Trails ( 3500x1648 ) (way too much useless space too)
Signs ( 6500x3500 ) (it REALLY don't have to be this big. Not to mention the useless space at the right)

My screen is at 1680x1050 and it's HUGE. Usually people don't use configurations much bigger than 1024
The Turret one got way too much empty space at the right, but it is a good size ( 583x601 ). The cursor one also got bigger signature than the actual sheet. If I may suggest, try to merge the cursors and the collapse stuff, and keep the font size in ALL sheets no bigger than 14 or 16 (the ideal would be 10, 11 or 12)

(05-28-2010, 01:57 PM)Ultimecia Wrote: Nah, you don't need to worry about the height (comprimento). When I say 600-800 it ISN'T 600x800, I'm saying the WIDTH should be 600 OR 800, tops. I've saying that the past 2 pages. And you also seems to love blank useless spaces.
And yeah, I listed Signs (it's the last one), the screens I'm going to upload them as zip (some images that big can get corrupted while saving).

(05-28-2010, 02:27 PM)Ultimecia Wrote: Foi oq eu disse: não tem problema de vc fazer do COMPRIMENTO oq vc quiser, o problema está na LARGURA. Se vc fizer o comprimento (HEIGHT) o tamanho q vc quiser vai acontecer q nem o RTB. Eu mesma faço isto. Para fazer um sheet q vai ser grande em geral eu crio uma imagem 600x1500 (no mínimo 1500). O primeiro numero sempre vai ser a largura (horizontal) e o segundo o comprimento/altura (vertical)

(It was what I said: there is no problem you use the height you'd like, the problem is the width). If you make the height the size you you'd like it's going to be like RTB's. I myself do this. To do a sheet that is going to be big I make a 600x1500 image (at least 1500). The first number is always going to be the width (horizontal) and the second the height (vertical)

Yeah, I saw the links from the first post and the dimensions I wrote here are from the files on it. Which means: it's STILL huge

(05-28-2010, 02:56 PM)Ultimecia Wrote: If possible from now onwards please keep the dimensions in mind (width), OK? The past ones if Ton2k don't say anything, let it be

(05-28-2010, 03:41 PM)Ultimecia Wrote: The sheet you linked is 680x1252. People usually don't LIKE stuff much bigger than that because it REALLY messes up any browser. I wasn't the only one to ask you for keeping them smaller.
Well the signs are 1024x512 each image, right? In this case you really don't have much choice, and the signs in Portuguese are even larger, so put one per line and you're good. Those are exceptions
Zip it if you like, no problem.