Okami Gameboy - Printable Version +- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com) +-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html) +--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html) +---- Forum: Creative Zone (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-86.html) +----- Forum: Spriting and Pixel Art (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-14.html) +----- Thread: Okami Gameboy (/thread-5443.html) |
Okami Gameboy - tsr moderation staff - 04-05-2009 for a devamp duel with Nitram (yeah, I'm screwed). RE: Okami Gameboy - Goemar - 04-06-2009 The head shape could do with a bit of fixing, points a bit too down. RE: Okami Gameboy - tsr moderation staff - 04-06-2009 RE: Okami Gameboy - dragon_knight - 04-06-2009 (04-06-2009, 08:35 AM)Tuna Unleashed Wrote: A definate improvement on the first one. RE: Okami Gameboy - Skink - 04-06-2009 Pretty half-assed background I must say. RE: Okami Gameboy - JarJar - 04-07-2009 I don't like Waka's health bar, looks like it was just scribbled in there, gb pixelart was more square and sharp, and I don't see any of that in this. The background looks what skink said, the health bar came out good, but even that doesn't look readable. I had to look closely to tell that ammy's health was down. As for the sprites themselves, ammy is alright but face seems to poke out too much like a normal dog, and wolves mouths are sharper. I don't like waka, I know you were going for more of a realistic look on him but why not just do it similar to the game style? A chibi sprite would be much readable and more fun looking imo. I'm sorry if I'm going harsh or rough but if you're facing nitram(who I share the same experience with) then you'll need more effort than that, I'm just telling you all this so you have a chance(since you seem to have doubts already). RE: Okami Gameboy - tsr moderation staff - 04-07-2009 I know, the only thing I really like is ammy. I'm probably going to rework most of it if I find the time. RE: Okami Gameboy - tsr moderation staff - 04-07-2009 tried to make it more readable, yet detailed. |