Posts: 1,362
Threads: 10
Joined: May 2008
What do you mean tall? My edit is the same hight as yours.
But I realy think we should keep the cheeks wher eI put them, they just look like ugly bags on yours. >.>
Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2009
10-24-2009, 06:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2009, 06:03 PM by Kirbyfan.)
Sorry. It appears taller, because of the moving of the face, mixed with the incorrect shape at the top.
I'm not really sure which is better. The bottom of Kirby's eyes are always places so that if you draw a line b/ them, in cut his body in approx. perfect 1/2s. But with this size body, and limits of pixels, they both do that =ly well. Which one is more correct, is unknown. I think that my placement of the face looks more correct.
Mew2King Wrote:they should make a cereal called jiggly puffs
Posts: 1,362
Threads: 10
Joined: May 2008
?
I actually like Kirbyfan's more. It looks the most like Kirby, and has the least awkward stance.
Arthur's latest one looks unbalanced, since the legs are at 3\4, while his face is closer to profile.
Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2009
What Sploder said. But one thing that he's missing in his argument, is the body shape. It HAS to be spherical.
Mew2King Wrote:they should make a cereal called jiggly puffs
Posts: 1,362
Threads: 10
Joined: May 2008
Uh, profile would be if you could only see one of his eyes and his arm was in the side of his body.
Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2009
He said closer, not at.
Mew2King Wrote:they should make a cereal called jiggly puffs
Posts: 1,362
Threads: 10
Joined: May 2008
Okay, so after looking at the sprites and such I changed mine to be absolutely symetrical from every side, and then realized you mean more circular and all that so I changed it to be that too, and then it was similar to your green underlined one (except that your green underlined one isn't symetrical)
And, uh I couldn't help but notice that you made your original kirby with the circle tool.
We all know that the circle tool doesn't make good circles
But really all I care about is that you move his cheeks. Seriously google image kirby and not a single one of the pictures will have his cheeks under his eyes like that, they are all of to the side. Like I said, they just look like bags under his eyes where you put them.
(Okay I lied, upon closer inspection the cover art of Crystal Shards has them sorta where you do, but every other picture has them where I do.)
So yes, fix the cheeks and I can sod off (and maybe find a nice inbetween of our arms)
^Oh yeah, I totally missed that. Of course, you'd also have to move the cheek blushes up a pixel, too.
Posts: 2,203
Threads: 49
Joined: Jan 2009
If I were to make Jigglypuff, could I use that sphere in the "merged kirby" post?
-----------------------
[Love]-----------------------
Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2009
Go for it.
Fixed cheeks. Yeah. I agreed with you. Just forgot to change.
Mew2King Wrote:they should make a cereal called jiggly puffs
Try one more with the face shifted to the right one more pixel.
Quote:You had wasted MY LIFE... waiting for just a goddamn bunnelby model.
-The prestigious Farlavor
Posts: 480
Threads: 15
Joined: Jan 2009
I like it.
Mew2King Wrote:they should make a cereal called jiggly puffs
I think that's the winner. What do you guys think?
Quote:You had wasted MY LIFE... waiting for just a goddamn bunnelby model.
-The prestigious Farlavor
Posts: 1,362
Threads: 10
Joined: May 2008