11-21-2009, 08:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2009, 03:24 PM by PrettyNier.)
This is just pathetic, BaB, I'm sorry. This attempt to justify that which you believe (born from subjective belief alone rather than evident reality) with such irrationally defined "evidences" is nothing but an irrational and forlorn endeavor, an attempt to uphold your own delusion so that you can bask in nostalgia.
Now that I'm done expressing my disappointment in you, it's time to actually say something.
You cite reviews and reviews alone without consideration for both the context and accompanying circumstance surrounding these reviews. For example, the fact that reviews for video game magazines are often almost completely subjective in nature; designed by individuals basking in subjective and contemporary opinion - in example, in the PSone and N64 eras, many games were criticized (heavily in some cases) for remaining 2D and sprited whereas other games were raised to a pedastal simply for being 3D adventure games "like Super Mario 64".
Honestly, your faith in video game reviews is kind of troubling.
Now that I'm done expressing my disappointment in you, it's time to actually say something.
You cite reviews and reviews alone without consideration for both the context and accompanying circumstance surrounding these reviews. For example, the fact that reviews for video game magazines are often almost completely subjective in nature; designed by individuals basking in subjective and contemporary opinion - in example, in the PSone and N64 eras, many games were criticized (heavily in some cases) for remaining 2D and sprited whereas other games were raised to a pedastal simply for being 3D adventure games "like Super Mario 64".
Honestly, your faith in video game reviews is kind of troubling.