06-17-2010, 02:20 AM
(06-17-2010, 02:05 AM)Gnostic WetFart Wrote: sorry, you've calmed down a little i'll try to be nicer!
i don't really see where you're coming from - I mean, I understand why you feel the way you do, but I cannot at all relate. i care more about how good the game is, and how enjoyable it is, rather than "petty" things like what the subject matter is (yarn, pink fluff ball, mushroom kingdom, etc,) and what dimension its going to utilize
i have preferences in those categories, but i'm not at all going to let those get in the way, nor am I going to fallaciously consider them to be more important than the quality of the game itself
Quote:you basically just said "oh ya if they made a 2D string zelda game it would be the best thing eva and nobody would care about the change in art style.hahahaha what, no
i said that those things are irrelevant to how good the game itself is
how can you misinterpret that so badly, jesus
Quote:Oh and with 3D there is A LOT more to explore and A LOT more to implement into the game if it is 3D, with 2D, you are limited with the amount of gameplay you can getno, this
kind of depends a lot on the game itself, you know
I know what you mean, you just care about it being a good game and ya thats exactly what I want to, and Im not saying this is going to be a shit game, or that its going to be bad at all, but the only things I don't like are the title (because of the word epic... i honestly think that word should not be used in a game title) and that it isn't the style of Kirby 64 or something if that nature, because in my eyes that style of game would be a lot more entertaining then what there showing for the new kirby game.
I would have loved a kirby game that has graphics like mario and zelda and with similar gameplay like super mario sunshine or zelda windwaker. meet characters, get abilities, partners, helping other charatcers/quests or something, and then like a main story while your playing, fighting bosses and shit. idk that would be interesting for me.