06-20-2010, 10:23 AM
If a game can't afford good graphics, odds are it can't afford good gameplay let's say... 6 or 7 times out of ten. That's not to say that a game with bad graphics is an unlikeable experience overall, and also it's not saying that a game that has worse graphics compared to another because of system or cost limitations doesn't mean that a game is worse gameplay wise.
Err, I guess what I'm saying is that a game has to be fun first and foremost. Then the decision on how good the graphics are kind of stems from the company that made it, how much they could afford and how much time they could have taken to make it look great.
But if there's one thing I know, I'm getting sick of games that look grey and brown. Pfft.
Err, I guess what I'm saying is that a game has to be fun first and foremost. Then the decision on how good the graphics are kind of stems from the company that made it, how much they could afford and how much time they could have taken to make it look great.
But if there's one thing I know, I'm getting sick of games that look grey and brown. Pfft.