09-20-2010, 06:02 PM
(09-20-2010, 01:40 PM)masterofdioga Wrote:(09-19-2010, 09:25 PM)Koopaul Wrote: Not true, in the world of video games anything can have a sequel. It's in movies where things should or shouldn't have sequels.
I never said it can't have it,
I said it doesn't need it, there is a difference there.
Also comparing video games to movies is a pretty poor argument when it comes to sequels, since they both have a fair share of shitty sequels.
(09-19-2010, 09:59 PM)JackMan Wrote: More to the point; and more onto Koopaul's post, it has TONS of potential for a sequel, and let's face it; it will always carry on with Luigi.
It's been a gimmick for him since the game came out; Luigi is associated with ghosts, vacuums, crap that was featured in-game.
They might as well just make a sequel and stop milking it.
Now see you're contradicting yourself on the last part to the point where it looks like you have no idea what milking means.
Milking is where you add a bunch of sequels that are not needed.
No.
Making a sequel means you'd be milking the series, but that only applies if the sequel was not needed.
No.
Look at the Sonic series and how much fucking sequels and spin-offs it gets, that's an example of a milked series.
Yes.
Adding tons of pointless sequels is part of milking, but not entirely.
It doesn't have to be spin-offs and sequels and things.
It can be any form of that series being re-used; like with Peanuts. It's practically public domain now, it's being milked, but there's no sequels or spin-offs to them.
And besides
If you didn't want a sequel, why did you come to the thread?