01-08-2012, 02:15 PM
When you base the quality of the game on specs alone, you're just as inaccurate as a person who bases their opinion solely on their enjoyment. A game could run a perfect physics engine and still not be fun. Does that make it a good game, because its programming has no flaws?
You need the combined, yes, opinions, of people with a developmental knowledge and people with an entertainment perspective, and just a touch of history, to determine if a game is good or not.
In direct response to Sol: Knowledge of development does not make any individual's stance on the quality of a game any more viable. It only makes their opinions on the quality of the techniques utilized more viable. These are different things.
You need the combined, yes, opinions, of people with a developmental knowledge and people with an entertainment perspective, and just a touch of history, to determine if a game is good or not.
In direct response to Sol: Knowledge of development does not make any individual's stance on the quality of a game any more viable. It only makes their opinions on the quality of the techniques utilized more viable. These are different things.