01-14-2012, 08:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-14-2012, 08:58 AM by Chris2Balls [:B].)
I'm sorry but I disagree entirely.
These comics are poor on several levels: the page layout is extremely linear and uninteresting to look at, which kills all dynamic in your storytelling. The stories in themselves have a poor structure too.
Composition in storytelling is essential, may it be in the writing or the drawing of your story.
Prioritizing your narration through size, position, colour and value is key for maximum effectiveness, expressivity and interest on the behalf of the reader.
As a pragmatist I am irritated by your specious remarks, justover6.
I don't believe in any kind of social filtering in this context, it only makes this practice even more of a closed circuit, which can get quite stifling. I don't believe in any kind of criticism filtering, either: when you receive assessments on your work, you don't passively content yourself with what is said-you have to analyze it and understand why it's mentioned to you in the first place. It's a system based on exchange.
These comics are poor on several levels: the page layout is extremely linear and uninteresting to look at, which kills all dynamic in your storytelling. The stories in themselves have a poor structure too.
Composition in storytelling is essential, may it be in the writing or the drawing of your story.
Prioritizing your narration through size, position, colour and value is key for maximum effectiveness, expressivity and interest on the behalf of the reader.
As a pragmatist I am irritated by your specious remarks, justover6.
I don't believe in any kind of social filtering in this context, it only makes this practice even more of a closed circuit, which can get quite stifling. I don't believe in any kind of criticism filtering, either: when you receive assessments on your work, you don't passively content yourself with what is said-you have to analyze it and understand why it's mentioned to you in the first place. It's a system based on exchange.