Users browsing this thread: 18 Guest(s)
Pokemon Gen 3 - Underrated or Underappreciated?
(02-13-2012, 10:37 PM)Radular Bastard Wrote: I really don't like that...
I love the designs in Gen 3 and it's are a large reason of why I consider it the best.

Well you got to understand I like simple, brightly colored, and cartoony. Makes things more iconic and recognizable.

That's why I never got into Digimon or Yu-Gi-Oh or whatever because their monsters where too complex or serious for me to love.

(02-13-2012, 10:38 PM)DioShiba Wrote: Not all pokemon need to have a sort of charm to be likable to you. How the hell do you think venasaur managed to keep it's ugly looks, or how magnimite looked dull as hell, or even how fucking dugtrio were just three naked guys hiding under dirt, hell you could even point out that magmar was ugly as shit back then. My point is the way the design is made doesn't mean it's going to appeal to everyone, in fact that's why there are so many of them to begin with.

Actually I don't think Venasaur or Magmar are ugly. I think they are goofy looking. I like goofy looking Pokemon too.

But Lickilicky was just lazy Gen 4!

Anyway these are my opinions.
Thanked by:


Messages In This Thread
RE: Pokemon Gen 3 - Underrated or Underappreciated? - by Koopaul - 02-13-2012, 10:46 PM

Forum Jump: