04-11-2012, 09:46 PM
Ah, really? That's a bit odd.
But yes, my point does still stand: the feet look much more natural in the first one. In the second one, they look rather stiff. Of course, maybe it's not the feet that's wrong with the second one, but the legs. I'm gonna analyze it in Graphics Gale and see what the difference is.
Okay, I think I see. I think generally the first one is more anatomically correct, if I'm not terribly mistaken.
But yes, my point does still stand: the feet look much more natural in the first one. In the second one, they look rather stiff. Of course, maybe it's not the feet that's wrong with the second one, but the legs. I'm gonna analyze it in Graphics Gale and see what the difference is.
Okay, I think I see. I think generally the first one is more anatomically correct, if I'm not terribly mistaken.