Inaccurately Accurate

[PrettyNier]

Okay, so poison is not objectively bad for the human body, and basic sustence is not objectively good. Right, okay. "Good for me" is quantifiable, both on the "subjective" level of what one decides they want (in which case, there is still going to be a slew of objective reasons for that) and what one intrinsically needs.

Flawed human thoughts? as opposed to what? Perfect thoughts? By whom?
Look, it is this simple: media, entertainment, art, these are all made for and by human beings, meant to appeal to human sensibilities. Our brains work in largely similar ways because, ultimately, we all have the blueprints for our brain. There are deviations, yes, but these are generally not major, and even when they are, there are objective reasons for them to be the way they are.

something is "good", in a qualitative sense, if it uses its own tools well to create a reaction with a human being. At this point you're probably to start going "but thats subjective!" at which point i'm going to have to remind you human beings are not subjective. certain things - absolutely - are going to be pleasing or displeasing to us based on their structure and our structure. this is a really, really gross simplification - as was the previous post.

get past high school philosophy class, man, you'll never grow up if you dont