It's because you're pretty much angry sounding in every post you're making here. idk if it's your particular posting style, but this here:
Nobody even told you that you shouldn't bother criticizing it. People were just counter-argumenting your argument, and that's apparently a big deal? You said something you find is wrong about that art and people said something they thought it was wrong about your comment, is that bad? This is the whole reason for posting in a forum in the first place. If you think around it, you're the one who's criticising everyone that doesn't see a problem with it and that they should actually see one, otherwise they're wrong and trying to sugar-coat comments to Gors.
(10-29-2012, 02:49 PM)StarSock64 Wrote: I appreciate Zac's post because it tackled a relevant issue (telling us why he thinks I'm wrong) instead of saying that my C+C isn't...what...worth the effort? No C+C is really "necessary," and that's for Gorsal to decide and nobody else. If it's flat out wrong go ahead and say something, but if your argument sounds similar to "you don't need to put the time into something like that because it doesn't bother me, even though I have no reason to say it wouldn't help" then that's really not an argument worth having. Especially when half the board apparently was bothered by it.
Nobody even told you that you shouldn't bother criticizing it. People were just counter-argumenting your argument, and that's apparently a big deal? You said something you find is wrong about that art and people said something they thought it was wrong about your comment, is that bad? This is the whole reason for posting in a forum in the first place. If you think around it, you're the one who's criticising everyone that doesn't see a problem with it and that they should actually see one, otherwise they're wrong and trying to sugar-coat comments to Gors.