01-17-2013, 12:34 AM
(01-16-2013, 11:00 PM)Kriven Wrote: I also think it's interesting that I'm being called out for expressing myself as being "objective" when a number of other posters have argued "creativity" as an objective point. Which it really isn't and never will be.
It's not that you shouldn't have an opinion. But what's wrong with the designs being more intricate? I've just never heard a complaint against something like this before. I usually hear complaints about the designs "sucking" or being "bad ideas", not that they're complex.
So would you rather have Pokemon continue to be stylized animals with extra features, like Tauros? I mean there are still Pokemon in later generations that have simple designs (Like Stantler, Sealeo and Ducklett). But Game Freak mixes that in with Pokemon that are extravagant in how they look.
Lemme put it this way. Which would you prefer? A bland watery soup or a soup with spices and stock in it?
Again I'm not against you having an opinion; it's just the subject of your opinion that befuddles me.