hm
cofagrigus druddigon buffolant
exeggutor gyrados omastar
I don't know about that koopaul, I think the names have always been hit or miss with the memorable thing. If you remember some but not others then it probably says more about your interest, then the general name quality. From a marketing aspect they are pretty much the same quality.
scolipede nidoking...
also I think the appeal of trubbish and garbador are what they add to the unova region as an immersible world. there locations and origin in game sends a deeper message then a pokemon like litwit or meinshow which seem seem to only exist in the region to fill a ghost/fighting quota
also also from a design aspect I find them much more appreciable then pokemon like -insert contrived fan bait-, because the designers were brave enough to stick to there own aesthetic rather then bending there will to what they think the fans would like (the fans that always think that they can do better)
I'm not a gen 5 appoligist or anything, it certainly has problems, but using a pokemon like trubish as a figure head to illustrate whats wrong with the artists change in aesthetic, as many fans do, is so backwards, because his essence is that of a gen 1 pokemon. Kanto is memorable because all the pokemon seem to belong, and trubish and it's evolution are a rare example of that in the current generation.
to all the people that dislike this guy, I suggest ruling out the rule of cool and looking more critically at what a pokemon like chandulure or haxorus adds to the series (very little conceptually).
cofagrigus druddigon buffolant
exeggutor gyrados omastar
I don't know about that koopaul, I think the names have always been hit or miss with the memorable thing. If you remember some but not others then it probably says more about your interest, then the general name quality. From a marketing aspect they are pretty much the same quality.
scolipede nidoking...
also I think the appeal of trubbish and garbador are what they add to the unova region as an immersible world. there locations and origin in game sends a deeper message then a pokemon like litwit or meinshow which seem seem to only exist in the region to fill a ghost/fighting quota
also also from a design aspect I find them much more appreciable then pokemon like -insert contrived fan bait-, because the designers were brave enough to stick to there own aesthetic rather then bending there will to what they think the fans would like (the fans that always think that they can do better)
I'm not a gen 5 appoligist or anything, it certainly has problems, but using a pokemon like trubish as a figure head to illustrate whats wrong with the artists change in aesthetic, as many fans do, is so backwards, because his essence is that of a gen 1 pokemon. Kanto is memorable because all the pokemon seem to belong, and trubish and it's evolution are a rare example of that in the current generation.
to all the people that dislike this guy, I suggest ruling out the rule of cool and looking more critically at what a pokemon like chandulure or haxorus adds to the series (very little conceptually).