(05-17-2013, 08:28 PM)Koh Wrote:(05-17-2013, 08:19 PM)Mutsukki Wrote: Actually, apparently you all do, because if you think it's easy, that's seriously underestimatingNo one ever claimed it was easy, but unless they had some sort of contract with Nintendo, they shouldn't be making money of off it. They can easily do LPs and not make money from it. No one said you can't do LPs at all, but you shouldn't be making money from doing that alone without the consent of the content creators. Sure, you made the commentary/script/edits, but that's ALL you're entitled too. Take the game out, and that's all it is, which, unless there's a game attached to it, has no bearing.
Of course that's all, it's the whole video that's left without the video. Then, by your logic, if you put that script in a series of still images, it would be ok because it's not a video? That has no logic.
Quote:Quote:How is -creating and preparing you own content- not original work?the same thing a fangame cannot be sold. Mario fangames can have original music, original sprites, original programming and original characters even. Though you can not sell it. No matter if you pixelled everything. No matter if you composed everything. It's still Mario, Mario is Nintendo, therefore it is illegal to sell your game. See how effort means nothing if the law isn't with you?
Which part of "they're not charging anyone anything" is hard to understand? And even if they did sell DVD compilations or shirts or whatever, like the Angry Videogame Nerd always did, the only thing copyrighted thing is like, the game's footage recorded by themselves, which I'm think makes it their right over the video anyway?