06-14-2013, 08:36 AM
I'm going to be completely honest: I fail to see the common sense behind it. Here's my reasoning why:
First of all I can understand some of the threads I made going in there, like Unlicensed/Pirated games and perhaps Ocarina of Time, but when it's discussion about the choices that the major gaming companies are making that can potentially affect the gaming market as a whole....I don't see how that falls under megathread territory. Not unless said megathread is specifically dedicated to the company, i.e. "Nintendo Megathread."
Following up...we have events like E3. So, E3 happens, the companies spill their beans and planned releases. Why is this a special case in which the planned releases get individual threads, instead of three (or so if there are more participants) megathreads respectively titled "Nintendo E3 2013, Microsoft E3 2013, Sony E3 2013" and etc?
Don't see this as rebellion or any such negative thing; I'm genuinely curious as to what falls under megathread territory and what doesn't, as I seriously don't understand.
First of all I can understand some of the threads I made going in there, like Unlicensed/Pirated games and perhaps Ocarina of Time, but when it's discussion about the choices that the major gaming companies are making that can potentially affect the gaming market as a whole....I don't see how that falls under megathread territory. Not unless said megathread is specifically dedicated to the company, i.e. "Nintendo Megathread."
Following up...we have events like E3. So, E3 happens, the companies spill their beans and planned releases. Why is this a special case in which the planned releases get individual threads, instead of three (or so if there are more participants) megathreads respectively titled "Nintendo E3 2013, Microsoft E3 2013, Sony E3 2013" and etc?
Don't see this as rebellion or any such negative thing; I'm genuinely curious as to what falls under megathread territory and what doesn't, as I seriously don't understand.