08-08-2013, 10:17 AM
If anything, the flash game(s) in question most likely violated the terms-of-service and fair use policies and probably the policies were updated a bit to fish out shams, and some of them were re-uploaded again after it was taken down the first time. Asking for money just because one made a fangame about mario isin't the best idea in the world..
Plus this hasn't been the first time the gaming industry had made it's consumers upset. Capcom was on a roll with dissapointment-after-dissapointment, from the DLC shams to it's sudden mobile phone card game RPG craze (which costed BoF a decent sequel after so long), Sega losing sight on what it stood for, etc.
Plus this hasn't been the first time the gaming industry had made it's consumers upset. Capcom was on a roll with dissapointment-after-dissapointment, from the DLC shams to it's sudden mobile phone card game RPG craze (which costed BoF a decent sequel after so long), Sega losing sight on what it stood for, etc.