07-07-2014, 09:32 PM
(07-07-2014, 09:17 PM)Kriven Wrote: It's not that I don't believe he isn't or alt, and it's not that I don't believe he is.
Just the idea that the burden of proof falls upon the accused:
Quote:unless you guys can prove that he isn't an alt then he's gonna stay banned
rubs me the wrong way.
I mean, if you guys have probable cause to suspect otherwise, that's a little different and it wasn't something I knew about before.
But at the same time, suspicion isn't the same as confirmation.
I'm kind of separted from the whole situation because I don't really talk to anybody outside of forum posts, so I can't say for sure which side is right. But having that perspective, it looks to me like the mod team is reacting based on pretense as opposed to fact.
The rest of my post kinda coincides with this- Although it was said after Chad admitted to us that he was AGJ (Which was when we banned him).
I do also really want to stop talking about AGJ due to the rest of my post as well, as I know it is stunts like that, which cuases the staff members not taking the community seriously half the time.
Also the thing is, is that you can't dupe that UNLESS the person actually said it, or quoted it himself. Meanin Chad literally did have to say those words, and why would he bother saying them to staff if he didn't want him banned