07-23-2014, 09:20 PM
That is actually quite annoying (I hadn't noticed that either until now). I can imagine having a payment system for more than one vote, but if you want to give a game a single upvote shouldn't that be free?
Also, paying $26 to give a game a huge +100 upvotes is a bit... unfair? Some people have surprisingly large amounts of money to spend and a single person like this can completely tip the scales. I think paying a buck or two for 2 or 3 votes is OK, but this is somewhat over-the-top. Game popularity should be decided by the number of people who like it, not how much money people have.
Also, paying $26 to give a game a huge +100 upvotes is a bit... unfair? Some people have surprisingly large amounts of money to spend and a single person like this can completely tip the scales. I think paying a buck or two for 2 or 3 votes is OK, but this is somewhat over-the-top. Game popularity should be decided by the number of people who like it, not how much money people have.