09-09-2014, 06:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2014, 06:55 AM by Raccoon Sam.)
Looks fantastic!
HOWEVER, a grid that's width is 16 blocks would give way more pretty results, given you DON'T remove the black blocks. Check out this sample:
![[Image: 81FFkNh.png]](http://i.imgur.com/81FFkNh.png)
Even so, I am not entirely sure if that's all the tiles. I think there's still something missing, and block arrangement instructions must be read from another offset ALSO to get the rest.
EDIT: yeah I'm pretty confident that the layer 2 block instructions are stored somewhere else. I mean, that's all the blocks Link can be in front of; what's missing are all the blocks link can hide behind, like tree tops etc.
EDIT EDIT: Also, what about animated tiles? Would that require four separate SGMs?
I'll look into this later today, hopefully finding the layer 2 block instruction offset
HOWEVER, a grid that's width is 16 blocks would give way more pretty results, given you DON'T remove the black blocks. Check out this sample:
Even so, I am not entirely sure if that's all the tiles. I think there's still something missing, and block arrangement instructions must be read from another offset ALSO to get the rest.
EDIT: yeah I'm pretty confident that the layer 2 block instructions are stored somewhere else. I mean, that's all the blocks Link can be in front of; what's missing are all the blocks link can hide behind, like tree tops etc.
EDIT EDIT: Also, what about animated tiles? Would that require four separate SGMs?
I'll look into this later today, hopefully finding the layer 2 block instruction offset