(11-18-2014, 02:52 AM)ShadeDBZ Wrote:(11-18-2014, 02:41 AM)blank Wrote:And this is how we know that this topic is done. When one resorts to sarcastic hostility and complete lack of counter points, the subject has died out.(11-18-2014, 02:31 AM)Kriven Wrote: You're right, I don't...
...demonstrable in-game elements do. Those are the only "constants" in this equation. I think, all being creators or creative minds of some kind here, we all understand saying "Oh, this is true about my character/universe" but later changing that decision? Until a statement has demonstrable effect in a published artifact depicting that universe, it can't be considered anything more than a malleable and idle thought passing through a creator's lips.
this is so deep. do you like ron paul?
(legit answer: that's a load of crock and really teenage edgy)
(11-18-2014, 02:32 AM)Iceman404 Wrote: This topic really needed to be made??
i apologise for being excited that maybe nintendo was stepping into the 21st century
i will remember to think twice next time u_u
mod, you can lock this thread until tvgr finishes puberty. tia
gg tVGR, wouldn't play again.
and "did this thread need to be made" isnt hostile in any regard? that's amazingly biased
plus you cant really counter kriven's argument when its just so vague and sad and whiny and edgy
"everything is nintendo when you really think about it, man. peace love and mario."
(11-18-2014, 02:54 AM)Iceman404 Wrote: Nintendo does not have to force bisexual characters in their games to please an audience. It's not like they're shitting on them or anything.
Calm down.
no one said bisexual. no one said forced. the producer made some good remarks and now we must defend the straight nintendo canon!