(06-17-2015, 03:32 PM)Vipershark Wrote: Just put Krystal in somewhere and we're good.
no, stop. please. krystal's the fucking worst why do people actually like her aside from her lupine assets
(06-17-2015, 05:51 PM)Helmo Wrote:(06-17-2015, 03:32 PM)Vipershark Wrote:(06-16-2015, 11:56 AM)Helmo Wrote: Star Fox 64 is a re-imagining of Star Fox, and Star Fox Zero is a re-imaging of Star Fox 64? C'mon Nintendo :/
I don't really see a problem with this tbh considering that the majority of the post-64 Starfox games sucked pretty hard. Taking the series back to what's pretty much unanimously considered the best game in the series is the move they SHOULD be making.
They took the 64 formula and evolved it to more modern standards. Just put Krystal in somewhere and we're good.
Following the old formula and improving upon it is fine... In fact that's fucking great.
The problem is this: they could easily do that and just make it a sequel :/
When every single good Star Fox game is a re-do of the same game that's bad, we just got Star Fox 64 3DS.
...
this baffles me
you have super hardcore fans who are pretty much begging for remakes or reimaginings of old, classic games (I've seen "literally make sonic 1 in 3D" WAY too many times) and when this is a series that pretty much rests on that principle, its fanbase complains
they're both series about animals, and one tries too hard to add to the formula and turn it into something completely weird and different to the point that people dislike it
and the other one just takes the same basic formula, setting, and characters, changes a few aspects, and adds genuinely new and cool game mechanics, and people still dislike it
Can Ya Please Anyone In This Day And Age
I'm glad it's not Starfox Command if anything rofl
Personally though, As An Established Fan Of The Starfox Series, I feel like the game could use some more on-foot exploration. Assault's on-foot missions where you equip and switch weapons just felt so....correct