Well I'll just say 2 things...
1.) Smash 4's community is having enough trouble as is agreeing on rulesets at the moment as it's a fresh game with a lot of controversy over things like allowing customs (no equipment), deciding whether to use 2 or 3 stocks, how long the timer should be, and even a new "mode" where only Smooth Lander equipment and Special Smash's Heavy Gravity mode are allowed (SLHG). This only adds yet another layer of disagreement and separation that no one wants.
2.) Speaking of what no one wants...! That's why you don't see item based tournaments! No one wants it!
1.) Smash 4's community is having enough trouble as is agreeing on rulesets at the moment as it's a fresh game with a lot of controversy over things like allowing customs (no equipment), deciding whether to use 2 or 3 stocks, how long the timer should be, and even a new "mode" where only Smooth Lander equipment and Special Smash's Heavy Gravity mode are allowed (SLHG). This only adds yet another layer of disagreement and separation that no one wants.
2.) Speaking of what no one wants...! That's why you don't see item based tournaments! No one wants it!
Quote:Also, defensive is not a negative thing. It seems like it is to you and a few other people, and probably to the current Smash Competitive Community, but that doesn't mean there isn't an audience for defensive play.It's definitely less exciting, but this is basically what the Smash 4/Brawl scene is
Quote:Making a defensive game more defensive just doesn't sound like an argument to me.I mean whatever makes you happy
![[Image: mousey.gif]](https://gifsound.com/?gif=i.imgur.com/TcCcmRE.gif&v=-9QFAQ4Am7M)