Fixed it, sorry about that. I often copy paste thread posts I make on other forums to here, and it seems to carry formatting from that entry box over for some reason, even though I haven't used any text formatting options manually.
I think a legacy reason is a rather poor reason to defend this design choice honestly. Just like it'd be a bad reason not to undergo any change in life. "It's always been that way." Doesn't mean it can't be changed for the better, no?
Mario never had intricate combat, however, it did have situations where bullshit did come up from contact damage and enemy placement...especially in Super Mario Bros 3, NES or SNES. All the Castlevanias, more specifically the arcade style ones, most definitely had their fair share of this as well. And in cases like Ninja Gaiden, where knockback is also an issue, it just makes for an ungodly frustrating playthrough of a game that would otherwise not even be that difficult. You could call it a form of Fake Difficulty.
I think a legacy reason is a rather poor reason to defend this design choice honestly. Just like it'd be a bad reason not to undergo any change in life. "It's always been that way." Doesn't mean it can't be changed for the better, no?
Mario never had intricate combat, however, it did have situations where bullshit did come up from contact damage and enemy placement...especially in Super Mario Bros 3, NES or SNES. All the Castlevanias, more specifically the arcade style ones, most definitely had their fair share of this as well. And in cases like Ninja Gaiden, where knockback is also an issue, it just makes for an ungodly frustrating playthrough of a game that would otherwise not even be that difficult. You could call it a form of Fake Difficulty.
![[Image: tamerkoh.gif?9]](http://a.deviantart.net/avatars/t/a/tamerkoh.gif?9)
![[Image: DevBanner.png]](http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q2/dlbrooks34/DevBanner.png)
![[Image: Youtube.gif]](http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q2/dlbrooks34/Youtube.gif)