02-06-2009, 06:02 PM
(02-06-2009, 04:44 PM)Dex Wrote:its not that big a deal, especially looking at each piece individually.(02-05-2009, 11:43 PM)Zeph Wrote: i don't entirely agree with him, but i see what he means. the horizon is perfectly straight in all 3 of them for example.
basically you've got straight lines where you'd expect to see them, and curves where you'd expect to see them, but a lot of artistic value could be added by mixing it up a bit.
i normally find most landscapes are normally straight, save for mountains, which the third piece has
the second one's the ocean. duh
first one i'm actually going to round off because it's the moon, but yeah, thanks i guess
I just saw where he was coming from, and instead of jumping on his back like everyone else I thought I'd point out that he does in fact have a point.
But going with what you said at the end, you really wouldn't see the horizon of the moon as curved if you were standing on the surface. but if it was drawn curved you wouldn't really see that as wrong either. Same could be applied to either of the other pieces, or even an exaggerated curvature due to distorted perception, or perhaps a viewpoint that isn't perpendicular with the horizon.