(02-26-2009, 06:10 PM)Tyvonnosaurus Rex Wrote: Namco or Capcom or Tecmo or Sega or Ubisoft or MicrosoftSometimes it's not how many games you put out. Look at Sega. My point is that Nintendo has never released that many games to begin with, but still stay successful. Also Ubisoft has been feeding most of the casual crap to Nintendo right now anyway. Ever heard of the Imagine series?
(02-26-2009, 06:08 PM)Diogalesu Gigahmeh Wrote: Feel free to object, because I to be honest want to see what your side of the view.I can easily object because saying things like "overrated" or "wasn't as good as this game" are all opinions. My point was to show you that Nintendo has been releasing the same amount of normal non-casual games as they always had. What you consider good or not is just an opinion.
(02-26-2009, 04:51 PM)KillerAslox Wrote: Like? 95% I see is crappy casual games when I check for games, and the rest mostly belongs to either don't care or already have.Twilight Princess was just a ported Gamecube game to me. And also I counted the number of casual games for the Wii. They are about 8 or 9 depending on what you consider casual. Yes that's quite a bit, but I hardly consider them crap. They are well made, unlike the hundreds of crappy casual games made by third-parties like Ubisoft. You can't blame Nintendo for third-parties trying to make hundreds of rip-offs of Nintendogs or Wii Play.
Also, you forgot Twilight Princess.
I cannot deny the large amount of casual games Nintendo has released, but they still do have "real" games. Which was my original point.
In short most of the crappy games you see on the Wii are made by third-parties thinking they can copy the success Nintendo has made for themselves. And despite Nintendo's success with casuals, they still make some good "real" games too. Nintendo could have just stopped making games like the ones I listed and just stuck with what's making them money. But they're still going to be releasing traditional games despite this.