fuck you Saria>Fado

she's way older with a child's body.

duno if that counts as loli...

new zelda game? cool............ be really kool if you have complete exact contol of link's swords...but..you know...


still, new zelda game, ya, awesome..

Because I really want my physical handicap to translate into real life.

It's already been said it won't require the usage of the WiiMotion Plus, so not happening.

(06-19-2009, 03:10 PM)Cotycrg Wrote: new zelda game? cool............ be really kool if you have complete exact contol of link's swords...but..you know...

like

I wouldn't want to learn fencing just to play the game

lol don't be mean to the guy, he can dream :p

(06-21-2009, 04:08 PM)gorsal Wrote:

(06-19-2009, 03:10 PM)Cotycrg Wrote: new zelda game? cool............ be really kool if you have complete exact contol of link's swords...but..you know...

like

I wouldn't want to learn fencing just to play the game

Well Red Steel 2 is doing something like that with the MotionPlus. I know they said that they're not using it, but it couldn't be too bad.

I just hope it isn't like Twilight Princess when, you would swing the Remote once, but the sword would slash two or three times. That screwed me up when I fought possessed Zelda.

then it's not complete exact control. But yeah, having a more polished motion-sensing would help. I've never played Twilight Princess, so I can't say I liked it or not.

(06-03-2009, 06:15 AM)Dazz the Conqueror Wrote: http://www.mcvuk.com/news/34590/Miyamoto...-Wii-Zelda

Behind the scenes, with no video, Miyamoto confirmed that there is indeed a new Wii Zelda coming out using the Motion Plus control scheme.

Well, let's hope it doesn't suck balls.

-It won't suck balls
-You do
-The game doesn't exist

Hey Dazz doesn't suck! ...but when has a Zelda game ever "sucked" anyway?

Don't argue with this, Twilight Princess may not have been as good as other Zelda games but it certainly didn't suck.

I THOUGHT THEY ALREADY MADE OCARINA OF TIME

(06-29-2009, 12:56 AM)koopaul Wrote: Hey Dazz doesn't suck! ...but when has a Zelda game ever "sucked" anyway?

Don't argue with this, Twilight Princess may not have been as good as other Zelda games but it certainly didn't suck.

phantom hourglass, eat shit.

(06-29-2009, 01:52 AM)Corpse Camo Wrote:

(06-29-2009, 12:56 AM)koopaul Wrote: Hey Dazz doesn't suck! ...but when has a Zelda game ever "sucked" anyway?

Don't argue with this, Twilight Princess may not have been as good as other Zelda games but it certainly didn't suck.

phantom hourglass, eat shit.

Fuck off, the only negative thing about PH compared ot other Zelda games was that it didn't have Tingle in it.

Why do people get so mad when other people disagree with which game is considered good or not in a series.

(06-30-2009, 12:20 AM)Arthur Wrote:

(06-29-2009, 01:52 AM)Corpse Camo Wrote:

(06-29-2009, 12:56 AM)koopaul Wrote: Hey Dazz doesn't suck! ...but when has a Zelda game ever "sucked" anyway?

Don't argue with this, Twilight Princess may not have been as good as other Zelda games but it certainly didn't suck.

phantom hourglass, eat shit.

Fuck off, the only negative thing about PH compared ot other Zelda games was that it didn't have Tingle in it.

the awkard control scheme, the completely unlikeable characters, the sailing somehow even made more boring, the return of an annoying ass fairy guide, that fucking stealth dungeon that you had to re-do like five times, going deeper into "fuck off, love miyamoto" territory every time.

phantom hourglass blew.

edit: and soul tracks or whatever that new game is called is going to suck too