(11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:

(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:

(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?

Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work.

They DID start off with the N64

Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.

I know that, but I didn't think it would matter for this.

It does. We're not going by the past

(11-08-2009, 10:18 PM)Mr.Bland Wrote: It does. We're not going by the past

Okay, that makes sense now.

(11-08-2009, 10:16 PM)Number Six Wrote:

(11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:

(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:

(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?

Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work.

They DID start off with the N64

Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.

Couldn't Banjo still qualify as a third party?

If so, I have eight companies:

- Sega : Sonic
- Konami : Snake
- Capcom : Megaman
- SquareEnix : Clo..*shot*...I'm mean....Black Mage? (Maybe Cloud...iono....or Sora? lmao)
- Rare : Banjo-Kazooie
- Treasure : Marina
- Namco : Klonoa
- Hudson : Bomberman

Rare is first/second party to Microsoft, ya git.

Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Nintendo and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back.


Does everybody get it now?

(11-11-2009, 03:47 PM)Number Six Wrote: Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Microsoft and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back.


Does everybody get it now?

OKAY-OKAY I get it now jeez

Though I'm pretty sure you meant "Rare is not a third party of Nintendo".
Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character.

Sorry my utter frustration made me mix up words. :l

(11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character.

(11-08-2009, 02:32 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: 8, but only one per company:
Snake, Sonic, Klonoa, Megaman, Bomberman, Black Mage, Marina, Travis Touchdown

problem solved

(11-11-2009, 04:17 PM)Mr.Bland Wrote:

(11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character.

(11-08-2009, 02:32 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: 8, but only one per company:
Snake, Sonic, Klonoa, Megaman, Bomberman, Black Mage, Marina, Travis Touchdown

problem solved

....oh. Must've missed that one lol
I don't like the idea of Travis in Smash, though =(. But I haven't found any other third parties I'd be interested in except Team Ninja, a subsidary of Tecmo...would Ryu Hayabusa qualify since Ninja Gaiden was on the SNES? If everyone agrees with Travis, though, I wouldn't mind

I have no idea who Travis is, honestly.

Travis Touchdown from No More Heroes.

So, would Saki/Isa be considered Treasure, or Nintendo?

Nintendo, i'm assuming, since Saki was an assist.