So...
| Poll: What are we doing with them? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Just four; one from the main third party companies (Sega, Konami, Capcom, Square) | 15 | 28.85% | |
| The way it was originally conceieved (8 3rd parties, 2 from Sega, Konami, Capcom, 2 "grab bag") | 16 | 30.77% | |
| 8, but only one per company | 18 | 34.62% | |
| Fuck it, take them all out. | 3 | 5.77% | |
| Total | 52 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
So...
|
|
Posts: 6,699
Threads: 104 Joined: Jun 2008 
11-08-2009, 10:16 PM
(11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:They DID start off with the N64(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work.
11-08-2009, 10:17 PM
I know that, but I didn't think it would matter for this.
11-08-2009, 10:20 PM
11-11-2009, 03:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2009, 03:34 PM by MaverickETC.)
(11-08-2009, 10:16 PM)Number Six Wrote:(11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:They DID start off with the N64(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work. Couldn't Banjo still qualify as a third party? If so, I have eight companies: - Sega : Sonic - Konami : Snake - Capcom : Megaman - SquareEnix : Clo..*shot*...I'm mean....Black Mage? (Maybe Cloud...iono....or Sora? lmao) - Rare : Banjo-Kazooie - Treasure : Marina - Namco : Klonoa - Hudson : Bomberman
Posts: 292
Threads: 3 Joined: Sep 2008 
11-11-2009, 03:46 PM
Rare is first/second party to Microsoft, ya git.
Posts: 6,699
Threads: 104 Joined: Jun 2008
Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Nintendo and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back.
Does everybody get it now?
11-11-2009, 04:01 PM
(11-11-2009, 03:47 PM)Number Six Wrote: Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Microsoft and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back. OKAY-OKAY I get it now  jeez Though I'm pretty sure you meant "Rare is not a third party of Nintendo". Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else  . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character.
Posts: 6,699
Threads: 104 Joined: Jun 2008
11-11-2009, 04:06 PM
Sorry my utter frustration made me mix up words. :l
11-11-2009, 04:17 PM
(11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else (11-08-2009, 02:32 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: 8, but only one per company: problem solved
11-11-2009, 04:35 PM
(11-11-2009, 04:17 PM)Mr.Bland Wrote:(11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else ....oh. Must've missed that one  lolI don't like the idea of Travis in Smash, though =(. But I haven't found any other third parties I'd be interested in except Team Ninja, a subsidary of Tecmo...would Ryu Hayabusa qualify since Ninja Gaiden was on the SNES? If everyone agrees with Travis, though, I wouldn't mind
Posts: 13,399
Threads: 305 Joined: Feb 2009
11-11-2009, 04:42 PM
I have no idea who Travis is, honestly.
Posts: 2,335
Threads: 42 Joined: May 2008
11-11-2009, 05:34 PM
So, would Saki/Isa be considered Treasure, or Nintendo?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: 15356.png]](http://button.desura.com/play/outline/games/15356.png)
![[Image: banner.png]](http://navigator.digitalhaven-ent.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/banner.png)
![[Image: 27348983yu7.png]](http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/8400/2hhfzud.jpg)
