+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-6.html)
+----- Forum: Gaming Discussion (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-18.html)
+------ Forum: Pokemon (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-69.html)
+------ Thread: Pokemon, what happened to you? (/thread-11698.html)
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Keychain - 03-01-2010
(03-01-2010, 04:55 PM)Alpha Six Wrote: They do, they're just way harder to find.Are they as exotic and crazy as the older ones? Like Missingno and the Mew glitch?
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Alpha Six - 03-01-2010
(03-01-2010, 05:21 PM)Keychain Wrote:Missingno still exists-- just not in the same form.(03-01-2010, 04:55 PM)Alpha Six Wrote: They do, they're just way harder to find.Are they as exotic and crazy as the older ones? Like Missingno and the Mew glitch?
He's been found in every game to date.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - GrooveMan.exe - 03-01-2010
(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries.
I severely doubt this. All Legendary pokémon have much higher BSTs than the majority (if not all) fully evolved non-legends. Lati@s may be an exception, but Soul Orb pushes them up into the range of the others again. The Trios of each gen also have lower BSTs, but they're still well in the range of the highest.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - tsr moderation staff - 03-01-2010
what the fuck is a bst?
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - GrooveMan.exe - 03-01-2010
Ah sorry. Base Stat Total. In some cases it doesn't matter; but in most it's the main reason why (for example) you'd find Venusaur stronger than Victreebel; even though they're the same typing and learn similar moves.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Alpha Six - 03-01-2010
(03-01-2010, 05:32 PM)GrooveMan.exe Wrote:Even this little shit?(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries.
I severely doubt this. All Legendary pokémon have much higher BSTs than the majority (if not all) fully evolved non-legends. Lati@s may be an exception, but Soul Orb pushes them up into the range of the others again. The Trios of each gen also have lower BSTs, but they're still well in the range of the highest.
And this one?
Or are these just not legendaries and their placing in the Pokedex is totally random?
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - JarJar - 03-01-2010
theyre the mew of the 4th gen
both of them.
mew-celebi-jirachi-manaphy/shaymin all have the same total base stats.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Gold - 03-01-2010
(03-01-2010, 05:16 PM)Chdonga Wrote: He's right about there being too many legendaries. I mean even if you don't count the sort-of legendaries, you could probably have an entire box of them. And half of them are weaker than non-legendaries.
I literally do have a box just for legendaries and I don't even have remotely close to all of them.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - JarJar - 03-01-2010
http://www.serebii.net/pokedex-dp/stat/all.shtml top 100 pokemon with highest total base stats
just to show who's a legendary and who isnt, and those who arent are psuedo-legendary(dragonite, garchomp, metagross, etc.)
580 and up is the limit, anything below that is nonlegendary (lucario is all the way at the bottom for retards who still think he's anything close to a legendary)
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Helmo - 03-01-2010
![[Image: pikachu-1zcp1gl.jpg]](http://www.eatsleepgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/pikachu-1zcp1gl.jpg)
![[Image: pikachu1.jpg]](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_lWET_BXRU9c/SZ4xaI4qU5I/AAAAAAAADPk/hRAFL173wyk/s400/pikachu1.jpg)
MY BEEF IS WITH PIKACHU. He used to be cute now he's just creepy and anorexic... but that is a bad pic of old pikachu
![[Image: ash_loves_pikachu_sm.jpg]](http://www.blogcdn.com/nintendo.joystiq.com/media/2008/02/ash_loves_pikachu_sm.jpg)
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Alpha Six - 03-01-2010
Sugimori has the best Pokemon art style, prove me wrong.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - Keychain - 03-01-2010
Pikachu was fat.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - drakion - 03-02-2010
and funny
man...pokemon season 1 2 and 3 was funny to watch
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - TomGuycott - 03-02-2010
There's a lot of Pokemon that shouldn't be called "Legendaries", just "super retarded rare" pokemon, even though in the game programing there's only one unique way to get them ONLY once. However, you can't blame them for having new legendaries every generation, that's essentially reducing the number of Pokemon. What you CAN blame them for is exponentially increasing the number of Legendaries per generation.
Gen 1: 5
Gen 2: 6
Gen 3: 10 (One of which had 3 forms)
Gen 4: 13 (Two of which had 2 forms)
So yeah, the AMOUNT of Legendaries per game is constantly increasing. They should cool off on that a tad. What would be kind of cool is more UNIQUE Pokemon, kinda like the Red Gyrados. Basically, Pokemon you only meet once in the game, maybe a variation of an existing one, maybe a cool one you can only get once or in one way, but not necessarily a Legendary. One thing Pokemon lacks is good boss fight Pokemon. That's kind of due to the nature of the game, though, I suppose.
OH, and in comment to the song, it's a fun and funny song. But if he's really serious, then just play the classics and stop crying tears of nostalgia.
RE: Pokemon, what happened to you? - triptych - 03-02-2010
gen 5: 28 legendaries
50 hour story
no online