+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: The Archives (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-66.html)
+----- Forum: TUGS 2011 (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-94.html)
+----- Thread: Rankings (/thread-17860.html)
RE: Rankings - StarSock64 - 07-17-2011
Yeah I definitely don't feel like I belong in advanced
you can switch me with someone more deserving
RE: Rankings - DJvenom - 07-17-2011
I go where the wind take me
RE: Rankings - GaryASPG - 07-17-2011
grooveman: taking the unpopular opinion to seem like the big man while not even coming remotely close to understanding the point
RE: Rankings - GrooveMan.exe - 07-17-2011
Not really! While I get that you might draw point in people noth thinking the actual skill levels match the rankings; it's really not being argued in that way (though I'm sort of assuming the first couple of posts are being facetious - I hope so)
RE: Rankings - PrettyNier - 07-17-2011
Quote:Not to mention the fact that it's kind of hard to judge something that isn't there????? Can't judge a baker on his pie-making skills when all you're given is the crust. Would you rather he just completely exclude the members who submitted unfinished entries?i can see this being the trail of thought here, but in the three main instances (des/pik/jar) there are examples that clearly outplace some of the other entries in expert. what is there shows where they should be. at this point the fact they are being downgraded solely because of that fact, not skill, is the issue.
that is the point.
im also confused about starsock and xgamer being in expert but not djvenom. the three of their entries are kind of around the same level
(no offense!!! i would put them in intermediate personally, but)
RE: Rankings - Chris2Balls [:B] - 07-17-2011
Right, I've made some changes, hopefully for the best.
RE: Rankings - triptych - 07-17-2011
"MY FRIENDS ARENT IN EXPERT, OUTRAGEOUS" what grooveman thinks we mean
"THEYRE NOT FINISHED BUT THEYRE STILL BETTER THAN SOME EXPERT SHIT" what we reallly mean
RE: Rankings - X Gamer 66 - 07-17-2011
I'm liking the current list.
RE: Rankings - Chris2Balls [:B] - 07-17-2011
RIGHT
DOES THIS FEEL BALANCED NOW, GUYS
RE: Rankings - Sol - 07-17-2011
(07-17-2011, 05:05 PM)Gnostic WetFart Wrote:Ah, my mistake, then!Quote:Not to mention the fact that it's kind of hard to judge something that isn't there????? Can't judge a baker on his pie-making skills when all you're given is the crust. Would you rather he just completely exclude the members who submitted unfinished entries?i can see this being the trail of thought here, but in the three main instances (des/pik/jar) there are examples that clearly outplace some of the other entries in expert. what is there shows where they should be. at this point the fact they are being downgraded solely because of that fact, not skill, is the issue.
RE: Rankings - PrettyNier - 07-17-2011
yes, this seems much more balanced.
RE: Rankings - GaryASPG - 07-17-2011
fair enough
im not in it but at least its fair
*cries and cuddles my dazz bodypillow*
RE: Rankings - Clear - 07-17-2011
Didn't think three years or so ago that I'd be up against these guys, this looks like it'll be fun.
RE: Rankings - Solink - 07-17-2011
I'm glad I'm still in intermediate this year because I pretty much stopped spriting since the other TUGS :>
I can't wait to start the real entries and maybe kick some ass! However, I'm a bit disapointed with the low number of members...
RE: Rankings - Chris2Balls [:B] - 07-17-2011
I'm tempted to add you in, Kori. That way it makes 40 contestants.