+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-6.html)
+----- Forum: Gaming Discussion (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-18.html)
+------ Forum: Pokemon (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-69.html)
+------ Thread: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? (/thread-18436.html)
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Alpha Six - 09-14-2011
(09-13-2011, 11:18 PM)oB2Kojjiro Mario Wrote:And it's unfair to say Rayquaza since there wasn't a third elemental being to match Groudon and Kyogre?(09-13-2011, 06:01 PM)Alpha Six Wrote:I mean, it's unfair to say Pikachu since there were four Japanese versions.(09-13-2011, 04:31 PM)Cshad Wrote:Also, Pikachu and Suicune.(09-13-2011, 03:35 AM)Kat Wrote:(09-12-2011, 04:05 PM)Cshad Wrote: Why
Also because Kyurem would be a dumb mascot for the 3rd 5th gen game. It doesn't even remotely look like the other two While Giritina did kinda look like Palkia and Diagla
Rayquaza was as similar to Kyogre and Groudon as Kyurem is to Zekrom and Reshiram. So that doesn't really matter at all.
And it's unfair to say Suicune since there wasn't a third bird to match Ho-Oh and Lugia.
:F
??????????????
basically what is being said here is that there is no mascot pattern and people need to stop acting like there is one
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Maxpphire - 09-14-2011
Even so, Zekrom and Reshiram have to do with ying and yang, there is no room for a 3rd thing there at all, not to mention the whole dragons backstory only involves the two of them.
So if they do pick Kyurem, it would be stupid, I mean at least Rayquaza looked like Groudon and Kyogre and like how they could be a trio despite Rayquaza not having to do with Groudon's and Kyogre's backstory. Kyurem doesn't even have the same shape tail, let alone look anything more then a fossil stuck in the side of a mountain while the other two actually look like dragons.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Alpha Six - 09-14-2011
It wouldn't be stupid at all, because then they could give it a backstory. Pokemon Gold and Silver focused on the story of Ho-Oh and Lugia with the three beasts as more of a side quest-- Pokemon Crystal did it differently and focused heavily on the backstory of Suicune.
This is the pattern. It is based on storyline, not likeness.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Maxpphire - 09-14-2011
Thats true too, I just think it looks too stupid to have a storyline anyway :I
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Alpha Six - 09-14-2011
At least it isn't Genosect.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Maxpphire - 09-14-2011
I swear, if it ends up being genosect....
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - NICKtendo DS - 09-14-2011
(09-14-2011, 06:35 AM)Kat Wrote: Even so, Zekrom and Reshiram have to do with ying and yang, there is no room for a 3rd thing there at all, not to mention the whole dragons backstory only involves the two of them.
Kyurem is Wuji, the absence of Yin and Yang. You have the black half and white half of the symbol; Kyurem is the imaginary line between them. He is the Boundary Pokemon. Also, Kyurem's main color is gray and his appearance shares some similarities with that of Reshiram and Zekrom.
There is no way Kyurem isn't the third/zeroth Tao dragon.
Back on topic of the new game, Pokepark Wii 2. Having added multiplayer for up to 4 players is something that should have been in its prequel. You simply can't expect a single player party game to last long. If done right it could easily measure up with the Mario Party franchise. Don't deny you liked playing the minigames in Pokemon Stadium with your friends.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Cshad - 09-14-2011
(09-14-2011, 06:06 AM)Alpha Six Wrote:(09-13-2011, 11:18 PM)oB2Kojjiro Mario Wrote:And it's unfair to say Rayquaza since there wasn't a third elemental being to match Groudon and Kyogre?(09-13-2011, 06:01 PM)Alpha Six Wrote:I mean, it's unfair to say Pikachu since there were four Japanese versions.(09-13-2011, 04:31 PM)Cshad Wrote:Also, Pikachu and Suicune.(09-13-2011, 03:35 AM)Kat Wrote: Also because Kyurem would be a dumb mascot for the 3rd 5th gen game. It doesn't even remotely look like the other two While Giritina did kinda look like Palkia and Diagla
Rayquaza was as similar to Kyogre and Groudon as Kyurem is to Zekrom and Reshiram. So that doesn't really matter at all.
And it's unfair to say Suicune since there wasn't a third bird to match Ho-Oh and Lugia.
:F
??????????????
basically what is being said here is that there is no mascot pattern and people need to stop acting like there is one
Rayquaza was the Ziz in Hebrew mythology, while Kyogre was The Leviathan and Groudon is the Behemoth. Hebrew mythology was also used for the other legendaries in R/S/E (Regirock/Registeel/Regice). So yeah, they are a "group", the mascot pattern was present, because Rayquaza filled the hole set by the previous two. Sky, Water, Land.
(09-14-2011, 06:35 AM)Kat Wrote: Even so, Zekrom and Reshiram have to do with ying and yang, there is no room for a 3rd thing there at all, not to mention the whole dragons backstory only involves the two of them.
So if they do pick Kyurem, it would be stupid, I mean at least Rayquaza looked like Groudon and Kyogre and like how they could be a trio despite Rayquaza not having to do with Groudon's and Kyogre's backstory. Kyurem doesn't even have the same shape tail, let alone look anything more then a fossil stuck in the side of a mountain while the other two actually look like dragons.
In Taoism there is Yin, Yang and Wuji. Yin and Yang represent opposites, while Wuji is the absence of both. This is even referenced in Kyurem's typing - Dragon/Ice. The cold, the absence of heat, which Electric and Fire produce.
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Tao_trio
It's also theorized that Kyurem was the corpse that was left behind when Rehisram and Zekrom split, but the game does not give any explanation pertaining to him yet.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Alpha Six - 09-15-2011
Well then I just sniffed a huge fart. The More You Know. :x
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Kosheh - 09-15-2011
(09-12-2011, 11:03 AM)Untitled Wrote: It's PokePark Wii 2, fucking knew it was gonna be something wack. Hopefully this will teach people not to hype for impossible shit, youd only set yourself up for disappointment.
holds your horses buddy
pokemon smash! airs on sunday.
there is still time for this to change.
![[+]](images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
SpoilerRE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Maxpphire - 09-15-2011
:I
Kyurem is still really dumb and they either should have chosen a better pokemon or designed Kyurem better.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Garamonde - 09-15-2011
(09-14-2011, 05:57 AM)Kat Wrote: Or even make it a gimmick 3rd game like in 1st gen but only you play is N. I know this will never happen, but if is some, on the off chance does happen, I thing I'd scream so loud that everyone will hear it, and in joy they will all scream too, causing the destruction of the earth |D
I wanted to play as Wally in Emerald.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - Lemonray - 09-15-2011
I dunno, I kinda like Kyurem.
Interesting note; if you look at Kyurem closely, you'll notice he looks... broken.
![[Image: kyuremu-ow.png]](http://www.serebii.net/blackwhite/kyuremu-ow.png)
His left wing is partially missing, as is one of his horns.
![[Image: kyurem.png]](http://img.pokemondb.net/sprites/black-white/back-normal/kyurem.png)
And, one of his tail spikes has been snapped off.
This leads me to think they'll give him another, 'repaired' form (Perhaps it could involve Team Plasma upgrading him, like Genosect??), and make him the mascot of the hypothetical third game, like they did with Platinum.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - NICKtendo DS - 09-15-2011
(09-15-2011, 10:49 AM)Kat Wrote: :I
Kyurem is still really dumb and they either should have chosen a better pokemon or designed Kyurem better.
I fully disagree. Kyurem is easily one of my favorites.
RE: So new Pokemon Game Maybe? - DioShiba - 09-18-2011
Kyurem has a badass design for a legendary.
just want to throw that out here.