Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Printable Version +- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com) +-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html) +--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html) +---- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-6.html) +----- Forum: Gaming Discussion (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-18.html) +------ Forum: Pokemon (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-69.html) +------ Thread: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. (/thread-20975.html) |
RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Goemar - 07-27-2012 I was thinking Sudowoodo. But well, he's a rock tree. I think it would be quite a stretch to say he was a stick insect... as he's not really bug like. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - TomGuycott - 07-27-2012 Know what I'd love to see? A stick insect that was a grass/bug type that was a tall stalk of bamboo and an insect. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Garamonde - 07-28-2012 (07-27-2012, 09:47 PM)Amon Wrote: I think jetters is joking but wooper Actually I didn't think know Wooper was based on that, oh well. Let's see... a goliath beetle. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kami - 07-28-2012 Nintendo is from Japan yet They haven't made a pokemon based off of a Tanooki. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Saltonara - 07-28-2012 This kinda looks like a Tanooki. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kami - 07-28-2012 (07-28-2012, 09:38 AM)saltonara Wrote: This kinda looks like a Tanooki.Thats a raccoon. Also Does it funcion like the shapeshifting Tanooki? RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kriven - 07-28-2012 Considering real tannooki don't shapeshift, and are extremely similar to raccoons, zaggy counts. Psyduck is not a playtpus. He's a baby duckling. All yellow and stuff. I don't think they've done wallabies. Or leeches. Or fleas. Edit: or mosquitoes. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - TomGuycott - 07-28-2012 There's no point of another shapeshifter when Ditto exists. And the idea of a more animalistic creature that takes the shape of other creatures is already taken by Zoroark. Thus having one just for the sake of making it exactly like the actual mythical creature is redundant and pointless. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kriven - 07-28-2012 Is Zoroark a tanooki? o-o RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kami - 07-28-2012 I thoight Zoroark was a wolf more or less. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Saltonara - 07-28-2012 (07-28-2012, 10:11 AM)Kriven Wrote: Edit: or mosquitoes.I was about to say Yanma but then I remembered Yanma's a dragonfly. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - TomGuycott - 07-28-2012 He just has that Illusion ability that makes him appear as other pokemon. Given he has that and ditto can transform into other pokemon fully, having a third one just for the sake of being loyal to the tanuki folklore is not a good idea without having good reasoning. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Zadaben - 07-28-2012 (07-27-2012, 10:16 PM)EvilRaccoon9 Wrote: But surely.... there's no ant pokemon....... ______________ Also Tom I disagree with you about a squid being a redundant version of Tentacruel. If they pulled off a squid well, and made it an interesting type of squid like the Vampire squid (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire_squid) They could make a Dark/Water type combination, and give it an interesting and unique moveset. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - TomGuycott - 07-28-2012 I'm not saying that it CAN'T be done, but having a water-type squid just to have a squid is not that interesting. Even a Dark/Water type is a little redundant given there's already Crawdaunt and Sharpedo. RE: Name Any animal that Pokemon never did. - Kriven - 07-28-2012 You also need to consider the design and natural role and characterization of such a creature. And a vampire squid is potentially one bad ass sucker. |