So... - Printable Version +- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com) +-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html) +--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html) +---- Forum: Creative Zone (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-86.html) +----- Forum: Community Projects (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-57.html) +------ Forum: Smash Bros Project (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-31.html) +------ Thread: So... (/thread-9756.html) |
RE: So... - Alpha Six - 11-08-2009 (11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:They DID start off with the N64(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work. RE: So... - A.J. Nitro - 11-08-2009 I know that, but I didn't think it would matter for this. RE: So... - Kairos - 11-08-2009 It does. We're not going by the past RE: So... - A.J. Nitro - 11-08-2009 (11-08-2009, 10:18 PM)Mr.Bland Wrote: It does. We're not going by the pastOkay, that makes sense now. RE: So... - MaverickETC - 11-11-2009 (11-08-2009, 10:16 PM)Number Six Wrote:(11-08-2009, 10:14 PM)HyperSonic92 Wrote:Yeah, and then they got bought by Microsoft. Not a party of Nintendo. Logic invalid.(11-08-2009, 10:13 PM)Number Six Wrote:They DID start off with the N64(11-08-2009, 10:12 PM)A.J. Nitro Wrote: Has anyone ever thought of having Banjo and Kazooie in this?Not EVEN a party of Nintendo. Won't work. Couldn't Banjo still qualify as a third party? If so, I have eight companies: - Sega : Sonic - Konami : Snake - Capcom : Megaman - SquareEnix : Clo..*shot*...I'm mean....Black Mage? (Maybe Cloud...iono....or Sora? lmao) - Rare : Banjo-Kazooie - Treasure : Marina - Namco : Klonoa - Hudson : Bomberman RE: So... - Ekoi - 11-11-2009 Rare is first/second party to Microsoft, ya git. RE: So... - Alpha Six - 11-11-2009 Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Nintendo and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back. Does everybody get it now? RE: So... - MaverickETC - 11-11-2009 (11-11-2009, 03:47 PM)Number Six Wrote: Banjo cannot be considered a third party of Nintendo because Rare was bought by Microsoft. It doesn't matter what happened in the past. Rare is not a third party of Microsoft and that's not going to change unless Nintendo buys them back. OKAY-OKAY I get it now jeez Though I'm pretty sure you meant "Rare is not a third party of Nintendo". Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character. RE: So... - Alpha Six - 11-11-2009 Sorry my utter frustration made me mix up words. :l RE: So... - Kairos - 11-11-2009 (11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character. (11-08-2009, 02:32 PM)Gabby Jay Wrote: 8, but only one per company: problem solved RE: So... - MaverickETC - 11-11-2009 (11-11-2009, 04:17 PM)Mr.Bland Wrote:(11-11-2009, 04:01 PM)MaverickETC Wrote: Just disregard Banjo and I'll think of something else . Or we could just give that spot to a Nintendo character. ....oh. Must've missed that one lol I don't like the idea of Travis in Smash, though =(. But I haven't found any other third parties I'd be interested in except Team Ninja, a subsidary of Tecmo...would Ryu Hayabusa qualify since Ninja Gaiden was on the SNES? If everyone agrees with Travis, though, I wouldn't mind RE: So... - Ton - 11-11-2009 I have no idea who Travis is, honestly. RE: So... - Kairos - 11-11-2009 Travis Touchdown from No More Heroes. RE: So... - Kitsu - 11-11-2009 So, would Saki/Isa be considered Treasure, or Nintendo? RE: So... - Ton - 11-11-2009 Nintendo, i'm assuming, since Saki was an assist. |