+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Other Stuff (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-6.html)
+----- Forum: Gaming Discussion (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-18.html)
+----- Thread: GameFreak getting lazy? (/thread-2176.html)
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Alpha Six - 10-08-2008
(10-08-2008, 04:50 PM)TheGamerParody Wrote: hold on when "Team Rocket" kills the mother(Marowak) of the baby Cubone from that city that has that haunted building(forgot name) wasnt that from leafgreen/firered and not gbc pokemon red .FR/LG was a remake of R/B/Y
B|
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Desert Cat - 10-08-2008
When a Charmander gets its tail wet doesn't it die? Maybe since Marowak is a ground type you can drown it.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - kyrtuck - 10-08-2008
To be honest, I SOOO lost track of Pok'emon after the second generation, don't know much about things, but a lot of the new baby and evolved forms looked stupid.
And Chao couldn't die from anything except old age, I kind of assumed it was the same with pok'emon. One of my friends said that once a pok'emon reaches its final stage, its completely immortal, but I don't know if that's true.
Frankly, I thought they never concentrated much on things like death for pok'emon because the franchise was meant to be a kids thing. Me no know.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Koopaul - 10-08-2008
It used to be that Pokemon would eat other Pokemon, but that was written off. Now they're all herbivores. Sucks. I liked it when Pokemon were like animals not people who you'd take a bullet for.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Desert Cat - 10-08-2008
I would buy a game that was a straight up Pokemon eating other Pokemon game where all you do it eat Pokemon. That would be SO RAD.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Koopaul - 10-08-2008
Are you being sarcastic? Because Pokemon is not Kirby.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Desert Cat - 10-08-2008
Oh no the game would be a completely different concept. I'm talking about something like Cubivore.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - [robo9] - 10-08-2008
(10-08-2008, 08:11 PM)sba sb3002 Wrote: Oh no the game would be a completely different concept. I'm talking about something like Cubivore.
cubivore,now that is an awesome game.But it would be hard to eat a rock pokemon,wouldnt it?
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Desert Cat - 10-08-2008
(10-08-2008, 08:41 PM)ravenboy9 Wrote:Nah, my cat eats rocks all the time!(10-08-2008, 08:11 PM)sba sb3002 Wrote: Oh no the game would be a completely different concept. I'm talking about something like Cubivore.
cubivore,now that is an awesome game.But it would be hard to eat a rock pokemon,wouldnt it?
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Ark Kuvis - 10-08-2008
Honestly, and this is just my opinion, but I think that Pokemon: Mystery Dungeon would be a lot easier if you could eat the Pokemon you kill.
Instead of chomping on apples, just swallow that Metapod you killed earlier. And when you, an innocent Charmander evolves to a blood thirsty Charizard, you'd finally sink your teeth into a Legendary Chicken Burger.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Koopaul - 10-08-2008
Yeah but Pokemon are like people in that game. I don't think it would be right to eat someone like that.
Look I'm not saying that I want Pokemon to eat Pokemon as an in-game thing, but rather something that is mentioned and acknowledged in say... the Pokedex?
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - LeleleleMAXIMUM - 10-09-2008
Weren't Ekans's supposed to eat Pidgeys?
Yeah, they screwed up initially showing a world where animals were replaced by Pokemon and then deciding that Pokemon were more than animals. More than animals, but people still use them for battle. Nice.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Desert Cat - 10-09-2008
So fighting Pokemon is much worse than having dog fights. I can dig it.
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - Chdonga - 10-09-2008
(10-08-2008, 10:46 PM)koopaul Wrote: Look I'm not saying that I want Pokemon to eat Pokemon as an in-game thing, but rather something that is mentioned and acknowledged in say... the Pokedex?They still do. When I caught a Tailow in Pokemon Diamond the Pokedex said something about them eating Wrumples.
Mr. Buttbutt Wrote:Weren't Ekans's supposed to eat Pidgeys?and Sevipers are supposed to eat Zangooses but that doesn't happen either
RE: GameFreak getting lazy? - JarJar - 10-09-2008
(10-09-2008, 04:15 AM)Mr. Buttbutt Wrote: Weren't Ekans's supposed to eat Pidgeys?
Yeah, they screwed up initially showing a world where animals were replaced by Pokemon and then deciding that Pokemon were more than animals. More than animals, but people still use them for battle. Nice.
Technically pokemon weren't suppose to replace real animals at first, since they were "monsters" and "real fish" in the early seasons of the anime all, but now they've replaced real animals. Another thing that came to mind is that the pokemon mangas make much more damn sense than the game and the anime:
![[Image: pikachuv01016dx6.jpg]](http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/973/pikachuv01016dx6.jpg)
![[Image: pikachuv01017mq8.jpg]](http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3995/pikachuv01017mq8.jpg)
Why didn't they say this shit in games? If not the show?