+- The VG Resource (https://www.vg-resource.com)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-65.html)
+--- Forum: July 2014 Archive (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-139.html)
+---- Forum: Creative Zone (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-86.html)
+----- Forum: Community Projects (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-57.html)
+------ Forum: Smash Bros Project (https://www.vg-resource.com/forum-31.html)
+------ Thread: Kirby* (/thread-4589.html)
RE: Kirby - Gold - 10-24-2009
What do you mean tall? My edit is the same hight as yours.
But I realy think we should keep the cheeks wher eI put them, they just look like ugly bags on yours. >.>
RE: Kirby - Kirbyfan - 10-24-2009
Sorry. It appears taller, because of the moving of the face, mixed with the incorrect shape at the top.
I'm not really sure which is better. The bottom of Kirby's eyes are always places so that if you draw a line b/ them, in cut his body in approx. perfect 1/2s. But with this size body, and limits of pixels, they both do that =ly well. Which one is more correct, is unknown. I think that my placement of the face looks more correct.
RE: Kirby - Gold - 10-24-2009
![[Image: kirby.png]](http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k109/Arthur_B/kirby.png)
?
RE: Kirby - Kitsu - 10-24-2009
I actually like Kirbyfan's more. It looks the most like Kirby, and has the least awkward stance.
Arthur's latest one looks unbalanced, since the legs are at 3\4, while his face is closer to profile.
RE: Kirby - Kirbyfan - 10-24-2009
What Sploder said. But one thing that he's missing in his argument, is the body shape. It HAS to be spherical.
RE: Kirby - Gold - 10-24-2009
Uh, profile would be if you could only see one of his eyes and his arm was in the side of his body.
RE: Kirby - Kirbyfan - 10-25-2009
He said closer, not at.
RE: Kirby - Gold - 10-25-2009
But really all I care about is that you move his cheeks. Seriously google image kirby and not a single one of the pictures will have his cheeks under his eyes like that, they are all of to the side. Like I said, they just look like bags under his eyes where you put them.
![[+]](images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Spoiler
We all know that the circle tool doesn't make good circles(Okay I lied, upon closer inspection the cover art of Crystal Shards has them sorta where you do, but every other picture has them where I do.)
So yes, fix the cheeks and I can sod off (and maybe find a nice inbetween of our arms)
RE: Kirby - Kitsu - 10-25-2009
^Oh yeah, I totally missed that. Of course, you'd also have to move the cheek blushes up a pixel, too.
RE: Kirby - Baegal - 10-26-2009
If I were to make Jigglypuff, could I use that sphere in the "merged kirby" post?
RE: Kirby - Kirbyfan - 10-26-2009
Go for it.
Fixed cheeks. Yeah. I agreed with you. Just forgot to change.
![[Image: kirbytsr2-6.png]](http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x276/Kirbyfan42/kirbytsr2-6.png)
RE: Kirby - Ton - 10-26-2009
Try one more with the face shifted to the right one more pixel.
RE: Kirby - Kirbyfan - 10-26-2009
![[Image: kirbytsr2-7.png]](http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x276/Kirbyfan42/kirbytsr2-7.png)
I like it.
RE: Kirby - Ton - 10-26-2009
I think that's the winner. What do you guys think?
RE: Kirby - Gold - 10-26-2009
Definitely.