02-13-2011, 10:38 AM
i don't agree with all that has been said in the thread, may it be from the staff or members.
1. pixel art's objective isn't purely to have the smallest palette possible- firstly, restrictions used to be linked to the hardware. secondly, since these restrictions have practically disappeared, it is up to the artist to choose whether or not he wants to reduce his palette.
2. it's not by dishing out threats in your first post here that you're going to get on well with anybody, on the contrary. especially if you use bold or italics.
3. banding makes your volume lose definition.
4. okay, we're giving out criticism, but this doesn't mean that we give a judgment without any justification. it's true that we could expect that this judgment would make the OP think why we said this in the first place, but it's always nice to know why the work in progress evoked that judgment in the first place, which could also help.
5. bye for now
1. pixel art's objective isn't purely to have the smallest palette possible- firstly, restrictions used to be linked to the hardware. secondly, since these restrictions have practically disappeared, it is up to the artist to choose whether or not he wants to reduce his palette.
2. it's not by dishing out threats in your first post here that you're going to get on well with anybody, on the contrary. especially if you use bold or italics.
3. banding makes your volume lose definition.
4. okay, we're giving out criticism, but this doesn't mean that we give a judgment without any justification. it's true that we could expect that this judgment would make the OP think why we said this in the first place, but it's always nice to know why the work in progress evoked that judgment in the first place, which could also help.
5. bye for now