12-21-2009, 07:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2009, 07:09 PM by a babyass man.)
god loves all music equally, settle down
I haven't made a topic today
|
12-21-2009, 07:07 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-21-2009, 07:09 PM by a babyass man.)
god loves all music equally, settle down
12-21-2009, 07:09 PM
god can suck my dingaling
*looks up* yeah
12-21-2009, 09:51 PM
Quote:those of you who Stairway to Heaven sucks either haven't listened to it all the way through (because the best part is after the second half) or are just trollingI am being completely serious and I have listened to it all the way through it just is not very good
12-21-2009, 10:01 PM
I don't even like the song but I still cringe at people who think they can declare things objectively bad based on their own opinions of music and apparent knowledge.
12-21-2009, 10:13 PM
(12-21-2009, 10:01 PM)Ravecat Wrote: I don't even like the song but I still cringe at people who think they can declare things objectively bad based on their own opinions of music and apparent knowledge. Then with this logic, is it not incorrect to say that people who declare things objectively good based on their own opinions of music and apparent knowledge are wrong? Thanked by:
Yes, that's true. It's not up to you whether something is (objectively) bad or good, it's likely up to either the masses or the experts. However, the difference between saying it's objectively good or bad, is that most of the arguments here are about succesful bands, and that likely puts them at a stage of objectively good (as can be seen by their success, mass appeal, etc.) and regardless of whether or not one person claims they are bad.
There are of course exceptions, when bad things become popular, but even those can probably be argued. 'Twilight', for example. Objectively BADLY written, however subjectively the story is good and appeals to a lot of people. I'm referring to conversations that go as such: Participant 1: I like *band*. Participant 2: *band* is bad. Participant 1: That's your opinion. Participant 2: No, I have come to the conclusion that *band* is bad, as I have used my knowledge of music to determine such. Participant 1: But I have come to the conclusion that *band* is good, as I have used my knowledge of music to determine such. It goes in circles, and ultimately ends up just as SUBJECTIVE as it was before you brang the whole objective bullshit into it. At the end of the day, you not having a taste for something does not make it bad, if it appeals to other people. If it doesn't appeal to anyone, well then you can probably safely say it's objectively bad.
12-21-2009, 10:31 PM
12-21-2009, 10:34 PM
we can all agree that brokencyde sucks total shit
Thanked by: Adam, Ravecat, Vipershark, Maxpphire,
12-21-2009, 10:42 PM
(12-21-2009, 10:31 PM)Dex Wrote:That's true, and probably the loophole in my argument, but if the appeal is few and far between, then, well. . .(12-21-2009, 10:29 PM)Ravecat Wrote: If it doesn't appeal to anyone, well then you can probably safely say it's objectively bad. And I'm not talking about cult hits, because those actually have a dedicated fanbase, of which most usually know what they're talking about in that area. And of course the people who like things because they're bad.
12-21-2009, 10:43 PM
(12-21-2009, 09:51 PM)Gizmonicgamer Wrote:wowQuote:those of you who Stairway to Heaven sucks either haven't listened to it all the way through (because the best part is after the second half) or are just trollingI am being completely serious and I have listened to it all the way through you really went through all that to just say "I don't like it" well whatever it's your opinion
12-21-2009, 10:47 PM
Ho ho ho, hanging around tSR has made me a senile old man.
I immediately read the thread title and thought 'why start now?' Thanked by: froggerfun265,
12-22-2009, 07:41 PM
12-22-2009, 07:47 PM
oh
12-22-2009, 07:51 PM
12-22-2009, 07:59 PM
shit you found me out
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|